ExLibris: excluded from social networks, Page 3

  *****

  “Mr. Parker, I have taken time to analyse your first case. As far as I know, that was when you hacked the web page of some company and the Judge considered non-custodial punishment to be sufficient for your correction. And you still did not complete it, which could result in certain complications for our current situation. But we will explore possible solutions later. Now I need to understand whether there was any connection between your actions which got you into trouble for the second time here in San Diego and that criminal record you already had?” the lawyer explained.

  “I think that court decision played the key role,” I answered. “Mr. Johnson, you know, it dramatically changed my life. And even all participants of the first case smoothly flowed into the second one.”

  “OK. Then I need to hear your version of the events which brought you before trial the first time and how they influenced your later actions.” Mr. Johnson was really prepared to handle the whole of my complicated story. “Tell me about the circumstances which resulted in you being prohibited to use electronic devices.”

  “I will!” I nodded.