Online Read Free Novel
  • Home
  • Romance & Love
  • Fantasy
  • Science Fiction
  • Mystery & Detective
  • Thrillers & Crime
  • Actions & Adventure
  • History & Fiction
  • Horror
  • Western
  • Humor

    US-China Relations (3rd Ed)

    Page 44
    Prev Next


      noted anticipated result of closer engagement with China was a hoped-for,

      gradual political liberalization in China going along with China’s greater

      involvement in world affairs. The actual result was increasingly seen as a

      much stronger Chinese government more capable of societal and economic

      Issues of Human Rights in Contemporary US-China Relations

      245

      management and control that effectively squelched signs of dissent or other

      liberalization. 21

      CONTEMPORARY HUMAN RIGHTS PRACTICES AND ISSUES

      Early in the twenty-first century, the Chinese government and party leader

      Hu Jintao (2002–12) continued efforts to deal with public grievances and

      domestic and foreign calls for redress and reform while suppressing activists

      who attempted to organize mass protests or create organizations at odds with

      CCP rule. The results were some improvements in human rights along with

      continued serious abuses. On the one hand, China’s developing legal system

      still featured corruption and political interference, but it also provided activists in China with tools with which to promote human rights. Although

      generally supportive of the status quo, the urban middle class showed in-

      creased willingness to engage in narrowly targeted protests against local

      government policies. Their activism added to more widespread social unrest

      among wage laborers and rural residents demonstrating against local govern-

      ment policies and practices and other conditions. Despite a massive effort by

      the Chinese authorities to control and censor information available to the

      public, the Internet and other communications technologies made it more

      difficult for the government to clamp down on information as fully as before.

      On the other hand, the human rights abuses by Chinese authorities included

      unlawful killings by security forces, torture, unlawful detention, the exces-

      sive use of state security laws to imprison political dissidents, coercive fami-ly planning policies and practices, state control of information, and religious and ethnic persecution. Tibetan, ethnic Uighur Muslims, and Falun Gong

      adherents were singled out for especially harsh treatment. 22

      The US government duly acknowledged Chinese advances and shortcom-

      ings, notably in a series of congressionally supported official reports includ-

      ing the State Department’s annual report on human rights conditions in world

      countries. US government efforts to promote human rights in China included

      formal criticism of the Chinese government’s policies and practices, official

      bilateral dialogues, public diplomacy, congressionally sponsored legislation,

      hearings, visits, and research. The US government also provided funding for

      rule of law, civil society development, participatory government, labor

      rights, preserving Tibetan culture, Internet access, and other related programs in China. The US government attention to human rights conditions in China

      was backed by more wide-ranging media coverage of human rights condi-

      tions in China and issues in US-China relations and by reports and other

      publicity from prominent nongovernment groups and individuals in the Unit-

      ed States with a strong interest in promoting advancement of human rights

      conditions in China. 23

      246

      Chapter 11

      American activism and pressure on China regarding human rights issues

      were tempered by an ongoing debate on whether human rights conditions in

      China were improving or not. On the negative side were US media, congres-

      sional, and other commentators who highlighted evidence of increasing Chi-

      nese legal restrictions on freedoms and cases of political and religious perse-

      cution. The annual State Department reports on human rights conditions in

      China were said by some to register no major or overall improvements. On

      the positive side were those who emphasized the expansion of economic and

      social freedoms in people’s lives. 24

      Further complicating the debate were the efforts of the Chinese govern-

      ment to become more populist, accountable, and law-based, while rejecting

      Western democracy and more far-reaching political reforms. Party leader and

      President Hu Jintao and other senior officials showed sympathy with seg-

      ments of the population who were left behind in the Chinese economic ad-

      vance. The central leadership also acknowledged human rights as a concern

      of the state, continued to develop legal institutions, and implemented limited

      institutional restraints on the exercise of state power. These steps forward

      came amid continuing administrative practices that retained a large degree of

      arbitrary power for the ruling authorities. 25

      Indeed, the American debate about human rights conditions in China

      mirrored a debate among Chinese authorities on where to strike the balance

      between efforts to improve governance and reduce sources of social and

      political instability through anticorruption campaigns, and the implementa-

      tion of political reforms and efforts to check mass pressures for greater

      change. Some Chinese leaders expressed fears that China’s small but grow-

      ing civil society, combined with foreign government and nongovernment

      assistance for advocacy groups in China, could bring about a “color revolu-

      tion” in China. With this kind of fear in mind and with continuing determina-

      tion to sustain and support CCP rule in China, the Chinese authorities en-

      acted legislation aimed at preventing human rights abuses, but without pro-

      tecting the activities of human rights activists who were subject to apparently arbitrary arrest and detention; it tolerated protests against official policies, but arrested protest leaders and organizers; public discourse on a wide variety of topics became routine, but politically sensitive issues remained off-limits. 26

      Getting the right balance of flexibility and coercion seemed especially

      important as increasing economic and social changes fostered tensions along

      with growing rights consciousness and social activism. Many efforts by citi-

      zens to express grievances and demand redress, having been met by govern-

      ment inaction or opposition, erupted into large-scale public protests. 27

      The mixed picture of positives and negatives in Chinese human rights

      policies and behavior was well illustrated in the annual State Department

      reports on conditions in China, which tended to focus on infractions and

      Issues of Human Rights in Contemporary US-China Relations

      247

      other negative developments, and assessments by Chinese and foreign spe-

      cialists highlighting various positive Chinese reforms and advances. Thus,

      the State Department reports in this period noted episodes of unlawful or

      politically motivated killings, including people who died in detention be-

      cause of torture. Torture seemed to be used commonly against Falun Gong

      adherents, Tibetans, Uighur Muslims, and other prisoners of conscience as

      well as criminal suspects. The Re-Education through Labor system, in which

      individuals were held in administrative detention for antisocial activity, without formal charges or trial, for a period up to four years, remained a central

      feature of social and political control in China. Unlawful detention and house

      arrest remained widespread, particularly agai
    nst human rights activists, law-

      yers, and journalists sympathetic to their cause, and leaders of unofficial

      Christian churches. Thousands of persons were viewed by the State Depart-

      ment as political prisoners, serving jail time for “endangering state security”

      or the former political crime of “counterrevolution.” China’s “one-child poli-

      cy” continued with fewer reports of occurrences that were more common in

      earlier decades28 of coercive abortions, forced sterilization, and other unlawful government actions against individuals.

      This list of infractions and violations of human rights from the perspec-

      tive of the American government was balanced by positive developments

      assisting greater freedom and helping ensure human rights. NGOs were often

      encouraged by the authorities to remain active in order to improve govern-

      ance and to allow people to give vent to their frustrations in ways that do not directly oppose one-party rule. Some representatives from these organizations and others outside the CCP-controlled system became more involved in

      advising with regard to government policies and behavior on a variety of

      topics. Media freedom was expanded in order to target corruption and other

      abuses of power. Freedom of worship within the range of government-ap-

      proved religious organizations and churches remained strong; freedom of

      movement was enhanced by government policies that tried to accommodate

      the more than 10 percent of Chinese citizens who left their rural homesteads

      to pursue opportunities in the wealthier urban areas. 29

      The purpose and scope of NGOs grew substantially in this period. At this

      time early in the twenty-first century. there are more than three hundred

      thousand registered NGOs in China and more than one million in total,

      including more than two hundred international organizations. Environmental

      groups were at the forefront of NGO development in China. Other areas of

      NGO activity included poverty alleviation, rural development, public health,

      education, and legal aid. The Chinese government from time to time tight-

      ened restrictions on NGOs and voiced opposition to foreign support for

      groups pushing reforms not favored by the Chinese authorities, but the over-

      all scope and activism of the NGOs continued to grow. 30

      248

      Chapter 11

      Another area of positive development was the human rights legislation

      and reforms enacted by the Chinese government. In 2006 the government

      enacted prohibitions of specific acts of torture and requirements that interro-

      gations of suspects of major crimes be recorded. Use of the death penalty,

      still egregiously high by international standards, declined markedly under

      instituted review by the Supreme People’s Court. A new Labor Contract Law

      went into effect in 2008, prompting increases in dispute arbitration cases and

      lawsuits over wages and benefits. Farmers were provided with new measures

      in 2008 that allowed them more easily to lease, transfer, and sell rights to

      property allocated to them by the state. Government measures took effect in

      2008 to require government institutions, especially local government admin-

      istrations seen as more prone to corruption than other government bodies, to

      reveal financial accounts related to land seizures in rural areas. Responding

      to international criticism of organ transplants for profit from executed prisoners, the government enacted new regulations stipulating that the donation of

      organs for transplant must be free and voluntary. 31

      The advent of party and government leader Xi Jinping (2012– ) has seen

      much greater emphasis on Communist Party control and the dangers posed

      by liberalizing forces inside China that are supported from abroad. There has

      been particularly strong concern over the activities of NGOs potentially chal-

      lenging authoritarian rule. There has been a resurgence of official state-

      sponsored Chinese propaganda focused on the United States and other so-

      called hostile foreign forces as threats to China’s stability and well-being.

      Domestically, the overall message fosters public suspicion of the United

      States and of individuals and NGOs in China with ties to the United States,

      Japan, or others associated with Western values. Meanwhile, China’s impres-

      sive, well-financed and broad-ranging public diplomacy and propaganda ef-

      forts abroad feature media distortions, censorship, and defamation of demo-

      cratic values. When combined with stepped-up Chinese pressure tactics and

      control efforts targeted against individuals and organizations abroad that are

      seen as adverse by the CCP regime, the result is a more serious challenge to

      American-supported values and norms. 32

      When Xi Jinping became general secretary of the CCP in 2012, he began

      carrying out a crackdown on dissent and activism that surprised many ob-

      servers for its scope and severity; it included the detentions and arrests of

      hundreds of government critics, human rights lawyers, well-known bloggers,

      investigative journalists, outspoken academics, civil society leaders, and eth-

      nic minorities. Indictments for state security crimes, which often are political in nature, rose in 2013 to 1,384 cases, the highest level since the Tibetan

      unrest of 2008. The government imposed growing restrictions on Chinese

      microblogging and mobile text services, which have become important

      sources of news for many Chinese people and platforms for public opinion.

      The Chinese government passed or considered new laws that

      Issues of Human Rights in Contemporary US-China Relations

      249

      • strengthened the role of the state security apparatus in overseeing a wide

      range of social activities, including those of foreign NGOs

      • placed additional restrictions on defense lawyers

      • authorized greater governmental controls over the Internet 33

      Summarizing adverse conditions in 2016, the State Department disclosed

      in its annual human rights report that severe repression and coercion was

      targeted against organizations and individuals involved in civil and political

      rights advocacy; and such severe repression also was targeted against organ-

      izations and individuals involved with public interest and ethnic minority

      issues. Past hopes that free elections would spread from use in the very

      lowest levels of governance were thwarted. Citizens did not have the right to

      choose their government. Authorities prevented independent candidates from

      running in elections, even on such low levels as selecting delegates to local

      people’s congresses. Citizens had limited forms of redress against official

      abuse. Other serious human rights abuses included arbitrary or unlawful

      deprivation of life; executions without due process; illegal detentions at unofficial holding facilities known as “black jails”; torture and coerced confes-

      sions of prisoners; and detention and harassment of journalists, lawyers,

      writers, bloggers, dissidents, petitioners, and others whose actions the authorities deemed unacceptable. There was also a lack of due process in judicial

      proceedings; political control of courts and judges; closed trials; the use of

      administrative detention; failure to protect refugees and asylum seekers; ex-

      trajudicial disappearances of citizens; r
    estrictions on NGOs; and discrimina-

      tion against women, minorities, and persons with disabilities. The govern-

      ment imposed a coercive birth-limitation policy that, despite lifting one-

      child-per-family restrictions, denied women the right to decide the number of

      their children and in some cases resulted in forced abortions (sometimes at

      advanced stages of pregnancy). On the work front, severe labor restrictions

      continued. 34

      Human Rights Issues

      A wide range of human rights issues continue to prompt critical attention

      from American officials in the Congress and the executive branch of govern-

      ment as well as American media, human rights groups, and other groups and

      individuals with an interest. Some issues—like the status of student demon-

      strators and others arrested during the Tiananmen crackdown and those suf-

      fering as a result of widespread abuses in China’s family planning regime—

      have subsided with the passage of time and changed circumstances. Others,

      like the human rights conditions in Tibet and among Uighur Muslims in

      China’s restive Xinjiang region, have become more salient as a result of

      violence in both Tibet and Xinjiang in recent years. Still others, like the

      250

      Chapter 11

      status and prospects of pro-democracy advocates in Hong Kong, have waned

      and then revived as a result of changing circumstances in Hong Kong. Mean-

      while, China’s increasingly strong and assertive efforts abroad to manipulate

      opinion and squelch dissent and opposition to the Communist government

      and its policies and practices have raised a new set of recently prominent

      human rights concerns. 35

      Persecution of Political Dissent

      China’s state security law is used liberally and often arbitrarily against political dissidents. In May 2013 the CCP issued a classified directive (Document

      No. 9) identifying seven “false ideological trends, positions, and activities,”

      largely aimed at the media and liberal academics. According to the docu-

      ment, topics to be avoided in public discussion include universal values,

      constitutional democracy, freedom of the press, civil society, civil rights, an independent judiciary, and criticism of the CCP. Universities have been

     


    Prev Next
Online Read Free Novel Copyright 2016 - 2026