"atmospheric phenomena". Many blackouts are caused by the equipment shutting down to protect it from surge or
brownout damage. Often when there is high demand for electricity, brownouts can occur due to lack of power available
to serve the demand. This can cause a domino effect, as one substation after another shuts down due to overload,
forcing the demand onto a neighboring substation. This was not the case in the Brazil/Paraguay blackout, which
stemmed from the dam itself. The blackout was sudden, affecting the whole area serviced by the power station,
showing that the outage stemmed from the dam itself.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta545.htm[2/5/2012 9:57:39 AM]
ZetaTalk: Brazil Blackout
Several high profile electrical outages have occurred in recent months - the Air France 447 failure of all electrical
systems on that plane on June 1, and the explosions at the Sajano-Shushenskoj hydroelectric power station on August
17 caused by an electromagnetic tsunami. Electromagnetic blasts coming from Planet X have been on record since
January 21 with the Earth's magnetosphere losing its S Pole or being twisted, often in synch with major earthquakes.
What happened at the Itaipu dam was not due to a particularly strong flood of electromagnetic particles, as the
monitoring of the Earth's magnetosphere shows. The magnetosphere seemed to be relatively calm. Where there was no
overall electromagnetic blast affecting Earth, the confused magnetic turmoil between the Earth and Planet X can cause
erratic magnetic flows in almost any direction. At times, Planet X and the Earth line up end-to-end briefly, causing the
Earth to lose its S Pole or for the Earth's magnetosphere to twist. At other times, there is merely a drift of magnetic
particles from the field of Planet X toward the Earth's field, causing an overload of particles.
Such a drift is erratic, and is attracted to the surface of Earth based on the
electromagnetic particles on the surface of the Earth. This is what caused the
hapless Air France 447 to shut down. It was the surface magnet, the Atlantic
Rift itself, that attracted a surge of electromagnetic particles just as the plane
was crossing the rift. What is it about the location of the Itaipu dam that makes
it susceptible to attracting such an electromagnetic surge? We have mentioned
that the S American continent has a seaway opening up along the Parana
River, ripping apart at Buenos Aires. River bottoms and seaway bottoms in
particular, are along weak points in a plate, being pulled apart and causing the
land to sink. Thus, such points have less of a shield between the
electromagnetic core of the Earth and any turmoil surrounding the Earth's
magnetosphere. A surge bridged the gap between magnetons in the field of
Planet X and the core of the Earth there, at that weak point in the crust, and the
wealth of electromagnetic particles being generated at the dam was another
attractant.
The pointed crop circle that appeared in Brazil two weeks prior to the blackout was warning those in this region that
their geography would make them vulnerable to such blackouts. The crop circle appeared in Ipuacu, just to the ESE of
the Itaipu dam near Foz do Iguacu. The crop circle pointed to the SSW, south of the dam and along the Parana River
channel. The crop circle was stating, in pointed language that rises above the language barrier, that the great Atlantic
Rift running down along the northern shore of Brazil was not the only place in danger of electromagnetic pulse. Those
who would like clarification on the warning that the visitors are giving them should give the Call and engage the
visitors directly. We have warned of increasing outages, such as the Earth experienced in 2003 when the massive tail
of Planet X wafted the Earth. These times are now upon mankind.
Brazil - New Complex Crop Circle Just Discovered
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta545.htm[2/5/2012 9:57:39 AM]
ZetaTalk: Brazil Blackout
October 29, 2009
http://www.colinandrews.net/CropCircles2009-Brazil.html
In the small town of Ipuaçu, a vast area of wheat and derivatives crops in the state of Santa
Catarina, South of Brazil.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta545.htm[2/5/2012 9:57:39 AM]
ZetaTalk: Neon Swirls
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Neon Swirls
written December 8, 2009
A dramatic cloud swirl, with a blue
neon cloud in the center, was
skies of Norway on December 8,
2009. This was sighted over a
range of 250 miles, so was not a
local affair. Struggling for an
explanation, the Norwegian media
proffered that perhaps a Russian
test rocket had caused the display.
The center of the cloud swirl had a
neon cloud, also swirling. This
neon cloud was similar in
appearance to one captured on
videotape in China on August 25,
1988 . Both were sighted and filmed
at night. Russia likewise had a
swirling halo cloud overhead above Moscow recently, much discussed in their media.
The display over the skies of Norway are not noctilucient clouds, which are ice crystals in the clouds catching the
light, nor are they earthquake lights. They are also not the smoking and curling light towers caused by methane gas
released during Earth movements, suddenly catching fire while aloft in the sky. The Norway display is akin to the
neon clouds seen on occasion since Planet X arrived in the inner solar system in 2003 and the grease in the tail of
Planet X has polluted the Earth's atmosphere. The neon appearance is caused by a chemical reaction, akin to man's
familiar light sticks. Up until recently, such neon displays required a light source in order to be seen, lit in the dawn or
dusk by sunlight or the lights from a city. What has occurred over Norway is a neon cloud, a grease cloud, lit by the
electrical charge from the tail of Planet X. Why the great swirl in the clouds around the swirling neon display? An
electrical charge in the sky is not a static matter, as the path of lightning shows. Lightning is an accumulation between
moving air masses that suddenly builds to the point where a torrent of electrons is on the move. But what if the charge
does not accumulate in one place, but is constantly present over a broad area? As with all swirls that develop in nature,
they start with a small movement in one place that creates a vacuum pulling matter behind it, and thus builds. Galaxies
swirl. Water going down a drain swirls. And these large charged atmospheric swirls are chasing after some part of the
tail waft that is more or less charged than the surrounding atmosphere. What occurs at the center of such a charged
swirl is more electrical charge than the surrounding swirl, thus the center becomes a neon cloud that can be seen even
at night, and wants to discharge, ground, in the Earth.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta551.htm[2/5/2012 9:57:40 AM]
ZetaTalk: Neon Swirls
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta551.htm[2/5/2012 9:57:40 AM]
ZetaTalk: SOHO Says So
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: SOHO Says So
written December 5, 2009
An object with a tail was captured
Check out the Pole Shift blog.
on a C2 image by the LASCO
Planet X has been spo
tted on
satellite . This object captured on
STEREO Cor2 AHEAD and when
December 23 has a distinct tail
enlarged it is a reddish-colored
drifting to the left.
cross, with a tail! The AHEAD
satellite is closer to Planet X,
which is coming at Earth in a
We have mentioned that as Planet
retrograde orbit.
X begins to turn the hose of
magnetic particles from its N Pole toward Earth, that
Earth would try to escape by moving as far to the left as
possible, putting Planet X to the right of the Sun in the
view from Earth.
ZetaTalk: Planet X Right, written December 27, 2008
Planet X was captured on March 27, 2009 on SOHO. It appeared briefly as the Winged Globe of legend. The 3:18
image captured the Winged Globe, the prior and later images did not have this rare capture. Per Skymap, only the
planet Mercury should be in the four o'clock position on that day, to the right of the Sun.
Where Planet X, in line of view, is normally behind the Sun blocking circle, the stereo satellites are positioned to either side
of Earth and thus pull in different views of what is behind the Sun as well as different views of what is to the side and in
front of the Sun, as the Cor Overlap image shows. Place an object approximately half way between Earth and Sun on the
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta550.htm[2/5/2012 9:57:41 AM]
ZetaTalk: SOHO Says So
Cor2 AHEAD (right hand) view, so that it would appear at the 4 o'clock position in the line of view. This is what is being
observed! Why did Planet X not appear on September 19, 2009, but now is doing so? Because the Earth is pulling far to the
left, trying to evade Planet X, placing Planet X further to the right in line of view.
The position of the object is similar to the
placement to Planet X (4:30 o'clock) on C2 and
C3 captures. In both the 2009-12-04 00:09:35 and
2009-12-05 00:09:35 images it is on the AHEAD
Cor2, but not on the BEHIND Cor2. The Earth is
the dot at the bottom of the orbit swath. Stereo
AHEAD is the fan opening up from the right of
Earth, includes the Sun and beyond. Stereo
BEHIND is the fan opening up at the left of the
Earth.
This issue was raised on Oct 3, 2009 on the GLP
chat regarding a September 19, 2009 image and a
September 24, 2009 image and a prior July 1,
2009 image and the Zetas said what was
presented was not Planet X at that time. In all
these cases a planet like Mercury was in the field
of view, and the images appeared on the BEHIND
satellite, not the AHEAD. Also the planet in
question appeared above the Sun in the Cor2 images. The December 4 and December 5 2009 images are below
the Sun in line of view.
When enhanced, the red cross that appeared on December 5, 2009 showed a flowing tail, similar in appearance to
other SOHO shots of Planet X and the appearance of the Planet X complex when it arrived into the inner solar
system in early 2003. This is not the appearance of a planet such as Mercury.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta550.htm[2/5/2012 9:57:41 AM]
ZetaTalk: Radar Circles
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Radar Circles
written January 25, 2010
What Now? Seen on radar by thousands today over Australia [Jan 22]
http://www.colinandrews.net/Cloud-Radar-Circle-Australia-2010-0122.html I have received E-mails from
all over Australia today reporting this rather extraordinary feature captured on the Australian
Government Bureau of Meteorology radar site. This follows a series of so far u-explained features seen on
Australian national radars since the 15th. For a while radar from the Melbourne Airport facility was out
of action ( see below). Another strange ring appeared today over the South East of the country as seen
below.
Radar sweeps pick up matter, such as flying objects or even heavy precipitation. Man is used to thinking that radar
sweeps present only what the eye of man can perceive. But this is an electronic device, not a human eye. What would
cause radar to record what man cannot see, and what is it perceiving? The white areas that look like spokes on a wheel
are the lingering results of changes that the radar emissions caused in the atmosphere, a type of coagulation of particles
that clump together and then have a dearth in between the spokes. This is very common in particle behavior, as we
have explained, the desire for similar particles to clump or group. In this case, the dearth of particles in between the
spokes is due to these particles in those locations being swept into a nearby spoke's clumping.
So what is the particle, and why has this not been seen elsewhere or previously? We have repeatedly stated that the
vast tail of Planet X is pointing toward the Earth, as it blows out from the magnetic N Pole of Earth and this is
pointing almost directly at Earth. The tail has petrochemicals in it, greasy elements, and charged dust. It has created
halos around the Moon and Sun at times, and neon clouds. The charged dust has created dramatic swirls, due to
magnetic parts of the atmosphere chasing away or toward each other. The most dramatic example of this to date was
the Norway swirl, which included a neon spiral at the center, grounding in the Earth.
The Australia radar circles are not caused by these greasy elements nor are they caused by charged dust in the
atmosphere. Australia lies near the Earth's magnetic S Pole, which is south of this continent but nevertheless nearby.
The Earth's magnetosphere is being tugged and twisted, at times the S Pole of Earth seemingly absent, as the
magnetosphere of Planet X is pulling it into alignment, end-to-end. This is a predecessor to the lean to the left and the
3 days of darkness, when the influence will be stronger. Nonetheless, at times the Earth today is dealing with a failure
or lack of magnetic particles returning to the S Pole, and this sets into play all manner of other dramas in the
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta558.htm[2/5/2012 9:57:42 AM]
ZetaTalk: Radar Circles
atmosphere.
We have mentioned that for every sub-atomic particle that man is aware of, we, the Zetas, are aware of 1,000, such is
mankind's ignorance. Thus, it would be pointless to name the particles involved in the radar circles. It is an
accumulation of these particles, normally swept along with magnetons into the magnetic S Pole of Earth, that are
clumping. This drama is unlikely to appear outside of the area of the magnetic S Pole of Earth, so will remain in all
likelihood an Australian drama, unexplained in man's scientific terms, a mystery to all but those who follow ZetaTalk.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta558.htm[2/5/2012 9:57:42 AM]
ZetaTalk: NASA Cover-up
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: NASA Cover-up
written January 25, 2010
A German debunking site posted SOHO images purporting to show that the Winged Globe of Planet X,
with streaming tail, was appearing in 1999, well before the arrival date of Planet X into the inner solar
system in 2003. [and from another] I have found these pictures in a German Debunker forum. The
explanation there are asteroids. It looks like Planet X of the last years. Now I am confused. Are the
pictures or the date from NASA faked? [and from another] The German
s were suspicious, noting that this
1999 example did not have the appearance of an asteroid or comet, which would have a streaming tail but
only one leading edge, not the wings. A very active thread on the Pole Shift ning
http://poleshift.ning.com/forum/topics/px-on-soho-1999?xg_source=activity resulted, where these 1999
images were examined. What was discovered was obvious signs of doctoring in the 1999 images. The
doctoring, a cut-and-paste job, showed up in many different analyses.
In the past month, those at NASA have been almost frantic about the appearance of Planet X on their SOHO images.
The decision to simply ignore this, or to assert that the WISE scan has picked up an increasing number of asteroids in
the area, has seemed too light a response. Certainly the argument could be made, as it was on the German site, that
asteroids never looked like this in the past, with a drifting tail and wings. Those at NASA fear their participation in the
cover-up will be revealed, and as the arm of the US government responsible for monitoring space, they would be the
likely scapegoats. Angry mobs at their gates, an inability to go home, and no place to run as it is not yet time to dash
to the bunkers. Gripped by fear, some at NASA made stupid decisions, allowing the SOHO archives to be doctored, or
should we say allowing doctored images to replace the original. The plan was to get the buzz on the Internet in their
favor, that what is being interpreted to be Planet X on SOHO images lately have been around a long time, thus are
likely some sort of asteroid swarm. Rather than go to message boards Nancy frequents, they took a side path, posting
these on a German site. What was not expected was how quickly the obvious doctoring would be identified, so quickly
that the asteroid swarm excuse could not take hold. What now? They will attempt to utilize the media, claiming that
any electromagnetic interference is due to the mild activity of the Sun, and hammering the story that asteroids newly
discovered by their WISE probe are swarming about. By this, they hope that those in the populace who can be led like
sheep will dismiss any Internet buzz that asserts otherwise. This is not a wise move on the part of NASA, however, as