disaster, the fraying and cracking are occurring to the east of a solid block of rock that is resisting any change. The
mining accident in Utah in 2007, just to the east of the Salt Lake flats, is in rock that fractures more readily than the
rigid Salt Lake flats to the west, which show no evidence of being affected during past pole shifts while the mountains
on either side of these flats are rumpled. This is also the case with the recent Reno quakes. An examination of fault
lines in California and Nevada show that the great inland valley of California has no fault lines. Like the Salt Lake
Flats, this area retained water in the past that evaporated slowly, allowing a slow settlement that formed a very solid
rock base. It does not bend or break. Thus, the bowing pressure in both cases is transferred to the more vulnerable rock
to the east. In the case of the Reno quakes, they are taking the hit for the inland valley of California.
Where does all this lead? We have stated that major adjustments in the New Madrid and associated fault lines will
occur before major adjustments along the San Andreas occur. The bowing will force this, as at some point the rock will
refuse to bow further and the stress along the weak points in the center of the continent will give. The fact that there is
a bow along the West Coast is what in fact prevents a major adjustment along the San Andreas until the New Madrid
adjusts. This rock is in compression now, along a curve, and the slip slide of the San Andreas has more friction than
usual to prevent any movement. Will more bowing stress appear? Undoubtedly. Clearly the line of stress has been
drawn, between the Utah mining disaster and Reno, so that vulnerability can be computed.
We are often asked how to determine safety in mountain building areas. Should one stand on a peak, or
seek shelter in a valley? This is not a simplistic matter, and it is impossible to state general guidelines or
even to give advice for a particular area. Hidden weak spots in the rock layers below might exist,
undetectable even for ourselves, the Zetas, and suddenly allow a cave-in or shift. This is what occurred at
the Crandall Canyon mine. The great salt flats in Utah show that they can withstand buckling, and have
done so through several pole shifts. Mountain ranges in the western US are termed new mountains as
their edges are sharp rock, showing recent fracturing. Rock layers that are compressed, in the
compression zone, will do one of two things. If hard enough, they will remain as flat land, as the salt flats
have done, forcing the compression onto the surrounding areas. If able to be fractured, the weak link, they
will fracture and throw portions of the layer up on top of other parts of the layer, thus creating mountains
from flat land. Crandall Canyon lies to the east of the Great Salt Lake Desert, and passes on any stress
created due to the bowing of land in the southwest we have predicted to the mountains to the east of these
salt flats. The weak link gives. The New Madrid Fault adjustments we have predicted to occur soon will
not just suddenly happen one day. They will be preceded by minor adjustments in the stressed rock. Weak
points snap, one after the other, until such minor adjustments no longer suffice. The bridge collapse in
Minneapolis, and this mine cave-in, are just a small preview of what is to come!
ZetaTalk: Live Chat, written Aug 11, 2007
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta450.htm[2/5/2012 9:57:31 AM]
ZetaTalk: Alexandria Cables
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Alexandria Cables
written January 31, 2008
http://www.wired.com/ The FLAG
system, that mother of all wires, starts at
Porthcurno, England, and proceeds to
Estepona, Spain; through the Strait of
Gibraltar to Palermo, Sicily; across the
Mediterranean to Alexandria and Port
Said, Egypt; overland from those two
cities to Suez, Egypt; down the Gulf of
Suez and the Red Sea, with a potential
branching unit to Jedda, Saudia Arabia;
around the Arabian Peninsula to Dubai,
site of the FLAG Network Operations
Center; across the Indian Ocean to
Bombay; around the tip of India and across the Bay of Bengal and the Andaman Sea to Ban Pak Bara,
Thailand, with a branch down to Penang, Malaysia; overland across Thailand to Songkhla; up through the
South China Sea to Lan Tao Island in Hong Kong; up the coast of China to a branch in the East China
Sea where one fork goes to Shanghai and the other to Koje-do Island in Korea, and finally to two separate
landings in Japan - Ninomiya and Miura, which are owned by rival carriers. Anchors are a perennial
problem that gets much worse during typhoons, because an anchor that has dropped well away from a
cable may be dragged across it as the ship is pushed around by the wind. Formerly, cable was plowed
into the bottom in water shallower than 1,000 meters, which kept it away from the trawlers. Because of
recent changes in fishing practices, the figure has been boosted to 2,000 meters.
We have spoken since the early days of ZetaTalk about the stretch zones of the world, where plates are pulling apart.
The Red Sea is one of these zones, as is the African Rift, pulling apart as Africa rolls into the Indian Ocean. The Suez
Canal is thus pulled eastward, creating tension on any cables laid under the Mediterranean from France or Italy into
Egypt. These cables are laid with slack, and pressed into the seabed where expected to be anywhere near where ships
anchor. For a single cable to be damaged potentially by a ship anchor might fly as an excuse, but two cables,
simultaneously? The point of fault can be estimated by the cable operators by a type of ping to the point of injury.
Both the damaged cables reached shore at Alexandria, with the injury estimated to have occurred 5.2 miles off the
coast from Alexandria.
What kind of tension were these cables under at this point? One end was secured at the point of landfall. Where the
cable under the Mediterranean was free, it had drag, particularly as it approached shore as it would be buried in the
seabed at this point, to avoid injury by ships' anchors. A cable under tension in this manner due to the plate
separating/stretching would rise up, and be a perfect target for an anchor. The ships whose anchors tore the cables were
not illegally anchored at the distance from shore where the injury occurred. Instead the cables were unexpectedly
above the floor of the seabed at that point, and vulnerable to being hooked by anchors.
Will more such catastrophes occur in stretch zones? Broken communications are the least of mankind's worry there.
Chasms will open up. Roads will tear and bridges will drop. Buildings will find their infrastructure shifting beneath
them, and will either drop into their foundations or slip sideways into a lean. Gas and water mains will continue to
shatter, with fires and explosions caused by gas leaks running rampant through neighborhoods or business districts.
The stretch has only begun, and will accelerate as the plates begin to move more aggressively.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta432.htm[2/5/2012 9:57:32 AM]
ZetaTalk: Alexandria Cables
Damaged Cables Cut Internet in Mideast
January 30, 2008
It was not clear what caused the damage to the cable. There has been speculation by others that an
illegally or improperly anchored ship caused the problem. This was the first time two undersea
&nb
sp; cables near each other were cut at the same time.
Internet Disrupted in Egypt and India
January 30, 2008
http://www.reuters.com/
The cable in question goes between France and Egypt.
Internet Outages Seen Across Middle East
January 30, 2008
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22914651/
DU told The Associated Press that the reason for the outage was a fault on a submarine cable
located between Alexandria, Egypt, and Palermo, Italy.
Severed Cables Disrupt Internet
January 31, 2008
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7218008.stm
FLAG Telecoms operate the 17,400 mile long submarine communications cable. SEA-ME-WE 4 is a
submarine cable system linking South East Asia to Europe via the Indian subcontinent and the
Middle East. Neither of the cable operators have confirmed the cause or location of the outage but
some reports suggest it was caused by a ship's anchor near the port of Alexandria in Egypt.
Mediterranean Cables Cut, Disrupting Communications
Jan. 30, 2008
http://www.bloomberg.com/
Six ships were diverted from Alexandria port and one may have severed the cables with an anchor,
said a spokesman for Flag Telecom Group Ltd., which operates one of the cables. The incident took
place 8.3 kilometers (5.2 miles) from Alexandria beach in northern Egypt.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta432.htm[2/5/2012 9:57:32 AM]
ZetaTalk: Dubai Cables
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Dubai Cables
written February 2, 2008
Once again an undersea internet cable is torn near where it makes landfall. This incident is in Dubai, on the other side
of the Arabian Plate from Alexandria. What is similar in both of these incidents? Both are offshore from landfall sites,
where the cable rises out of the seabed to connect at a spot where it is fixed. Such a spot creates tension if the cable is
being stretched, causing the cable to rise up out of the seabed and reducing slack. This causes the tense cable to be
vulnerable to ships' anchors. The Flag Falcon was a new cable, laid since early 2005 and thus plowed into the seabed
properly and recently to avoid ships' anchors in shallow water. If the breach offshore from Alexandria was due to the
stretch zone in the Mediterranean caused by the African continent rolling eastward and dropping into the Indian Ocean,
what caused this stretch offshore from Dubai?
After leaving Alexandria, the cables cross the Suez Canal to land on the east of the canal, thence down the Red Sea to
where it empties into the Indian Ocean, thence along the bottom of the "boot" of the Arabian peninsula and up around
the "toe" formed by Oman to landfall in Dubai. As we have stated, the Arabian plate will rotate as this region of the
world is pulled apart. As though the "boot" were walking, it will move from where the "heel" appears to be landing to
where the "boot" is rolling to be positioned on its "toe". Where this does not put tension along a cable laid around the
edges of the "boot", it puts tension on the cable from another end - the landfall in India and Pakistan. The "heel" of the
boot has been pulled away from India and Pakistan. Overall, the stretch zones around the Arabian Plate are pulling
open, thus there is less slack on any cables laid there.
Internet Provider in UAE Confirms Undersea Cable Cut Between Dubai, Oman, Cause Unknown
February 2, 2008
An undersea cable had been cut in the Persian Gulf, causing severe phone line disruptions and
compounding an already existing Internet outage across large parts of the Middle East and Asia
after two other undersea cables were damaged earlier this week north of Egypt. It was not known
how the underwater FLAG FALCON cable, stretching between the United Arab Emirates and Oman,
had been damaged. Workers were still trying to determine how the Persian Gulf cable was cut.
Saudi Arabia Confirms Multi-Million Dollar Investement in FALCON
May 7, 2005
http://www.ameinfo.com/59481.html
FALCON, a new high-capacity resilient loop cable system is being installed to provide multiple
landings throughout the Gulf region, with submarine links stretching from the Middle East to Egypt
in the west and, initially, to India in the east.
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta433.htm[2/5/2012 9:57:33 AM]
ZetaTalk: Mercury's Shroud
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Mercury's Shroud
written January 5, 2008
Last week on the newsletter we discussed Planet X being captured on one of the LASCO C2 satellite
images, on the right hand side of the Sun and with its tail wafting to the left. If the tail were wafting left,
On that day, someone noticed a large orb in the lower left quadrant of a satellite camera that floats 21º
ahead of the Earth in her orbit - called the Stereo Ahead satellite. Mercury was crossing the line of view of
this satellite, crossing behind the Sun and moving right to left in the view. The position of the large blob
was the correct position for Mercury as seen from this satellite camera.
But unlike the normal appearance of a passing planet, that appearance being a bright spot on the film,
Mercury changed in appearance, became dull rather than bright, increased in size, and appeared to be
rotating in a dust cloud wrapped around it. This generated a great deal of discussion on the
GodlikeProduction message board. The object indeed had tracked across and just below the Sun as
Mercury was expected to do from view from the Stereo Ahead satellite. But the change in appearance left
many unconvinced that it was indeed Mercury. The discussion ranged from ascribing the dull, large object
to be asteroid 1685Torror (which was not yet in front of the cameras), or Jupiter (which had passed from
view days earlier, moved off to the right hand, and should also be bright in any case), some sort of new
planet ejected from the Sun, or a large mothership. Someone claiming to have had a discussion with JPL
even claimed this huge blob to be a star, though stars are bright pin-points on the LASCO images. But in
that this object had tracked as expected for Mercury, appearing on the right hand side on December 22 and
leaving on the left hand side on December 31, Mercury seemed to be the logical candidate. But why so
dark and diffuse? And why the increase in size?
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta425.htm[2/5/2012 9:57:34 AM]
ZetaTalk: Mercury's Shroud
The orb presumed to be Mercury does not have the traditional aspect of passing planets. It appears too large and loses
its light halfway through the transit. What kind of dust cloud could be obscuring the view of Mercury and diffusing the
light so it looks too large? What kind of dust is swirling in front of the light from Mercury so that it appears to be
rotating in place? The asteroid 1685Torro was thrown out as the explanation but likewise is not in the field of view per
official orbit diagrams. Nor did the attempt from a NASA stooge to claim it as a star gain any advocates. What was
discovered were many moon-like objects, reflecting light from the right hand side of the Sun. What is that light
source? Clearly it is the object that was reflected on a December 23 LASCO image, an object with a tail drifting to the
left, showing that the tail debris would logically be drifting left
to be in front of the SOHO cameras.
What was discovered were many moon-like objects, reflecting light from the right hand side of the Sun. What is that
light source? Clearly it is the object that was reflected on a December 23 LASCO image, an object with a tail drifting
to the left, showing that the tail debris would logically be drifting left to be in front of the SOHO cameras. Their
presence, so very much in the direction of Earth, presages another phenomena that will soon be evident to all on Earth.
About this we will say little, in keeping with our desire to have the establishment discombobulated so the cover-up
splits wide open like a rotten melon, spewing the truth about so broadly that it cannot be quickly dismissed.
Where is this leading? We have hinted that the drama is not yet over. We have hinted that earthquakes will be
involved, and things seen in the skies. We are not allowed by the rules to be precise in our predictions, so cannot warn
mankind of coming dangers. Regarding anything that would tend to prove the existence of Planet X and cause the
cover-up to split open, we likewise do not want to clue the establishment into what that might be, as we want them to
stumble. We want the participants in the cover-up to be frightened and blurt out the truth or fail to maintain the cover-
up so that holes in the story line are obvious. Beyond this, it is leading to more severe Earth changes, which we have
been predicting since the start of ZetaTalk. Diasasters will become so common they will no longer hit the news, and
may not even be locally reported. Emergency management teams will be exhausted, and may not even notice a change
in leadership in the White House during this time - Pelosi or Gore in the Oval Office at long last. These disasters,
increasing at what seems an exponential rate, will morph into the last weeks we have so carefully detailed. And then
the pole shift!
During the discussion on Mercury's odd appearance in the Stereo Ahead images, many small moon-like
objects were discovered. These had a different appearance from the stars which sometimes appear in
these images. These moons were large and illuminated on one side only. If Planet X is to the right of the