assuming a 5 year forward publication to be the most broadly accessed after a yearly calendar, and adding that extra
year for publication preparation, and considering that 5 year forward publications for 2002 would start at the first of the
year, they calculated that changes to their stats needed to be done by the end of 1994. These manipulations did two
very obvious things to their stats:
1. the actual phases of the Moon were out of sync with their stats during 1995 and for the immediate years
following. However, since the public in general refers to printed matter that had been printed much earlier, and
was based on Navy stats gathered prior to the manipulation, this would likely not be noticed by the public.
2. the Navy stats related to the rotation of the Earth (the phases of the Moon and Earth Seasons), would be out of
sync with past data, should someone run these numbers.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p127.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:28 AM]
ZetaTalk: Slowing Rotation
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p127.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:28 AM]
ZetaTalk: Trend Data
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Trend Data
Note: written on Jun 15, 2001.
To understand trends that show up on charts reflecting the date and time of Full Moons and the Equinox, bear in mind
that you are analyzing Navy data and not just the actual progress of the moon and earth. Look at this from the
standpoint of the Navy, and what they were tasked with. Indeed, it has taken a slight amount of time more for the
slowing earth to arrive lined up for the Equinox. This is a sync point taken at midnight and thus not easily fudged, so
reflects the actual slowdown, unannounced, to date. This is the trend line for Equinox, taking more time to arrive, and
is the more obvious as it has only one factor to consider, the Earth's orbit around the Sun. The Equinox is computed,
by the Navy, and only actually measured every 4 years (in accordance with leap year syncing). This is because during
the 4 years that it takes to complete a leap year cycle, the Equinox per definition is around the globe, probably 1/4 turn
each turn or so each year for a given Spring or Fall Equinox. Why don't they do an actual measure as it goes around
the globe? Because most of the equator, or a good part of it, is over ocean. To measure the exact split second that the
sun tips over the equator would require more stability than a ship can provide. Wave bobble, and the ship to be certain
it is at the exact coordinates must use guidance systems that could be off a hair, etc. So they rely on a computated
Equinox for 3 out of 4 years. But then they do measure the Equinox from a set physical land position, every four years,
and this is what is late to arrive (at that physical point!).
The Full Moon operates differently, as this has two factors to consider, the moon's orbit around the Earth as well as the
turning of the Earth, and thus is more varied and less easy for the general public to follow. We have mentioned that to
pre-set the data to make the Earth's slowing less obvious, the Navy shortened the Full Moon periods in their data
charts, and this began shortly after the confirmed existence of Planet X in 1983. This pre-setting was done so that the
slowing Earth took fewer days between Full Moons, in their charts, so that the eventual actual slowdown of the Earth
would hopefully match their charts during a time of greater curiosity and scrutiny. But prior to this decision to pre-set
the data in anticipation of a significantly slowing Earth, the Navy dealt with a gradually slowing Earth. A Full Moon,
to be visible from Earth, must line up the Sun, Earth, and Moon so that the Moon has full sun and is visible as such
from the Earth. This puts the Moon to the back half of the Earth, for such a view. During the slowing rotation of the
Earth, the Sun and Moon truck along as usual, not slowing. Thus, the Moon is positioned to present itself as full on
time, but the spot on Earth predicted to be able to view a Full Moon may not be in position, if the Earth is rotating
more slowly. The Earth thus seems to take longer, in a very gradual slowdown, for a given spot on Earth to arrive
where it can view the Full Moon. The added time is only allowing the Earth to position itself for a view. But at a
certain point in this slowing process, those looking to view the full moon will not be in position on the proper night. At
first, the moon is viewed on this horizon, then overhead, then on the other horizon, but still able to be viewed on the
of fullness can be confused by sunlight disbursing through the atmosphere. Thus it was in anticipation of a literal day
difference between viewing Full Moons, with the Full Moon seeming to arrive that much early, that the chart data was
pre-set.
Until the actual discovery of Planet X in 1983, there was great reluctance, due to the possibility of discovery, to change
the predicated date/time charts. The astronomical community is exacting, and should the tampered data be discovered,
the evidence could not be retracted or lost. But panic reigned, during the days when the cover-up over Planet X was
being hatched, and steps were taken that give evidence of this panic.
1. the predicated Full Moon and Equinox data were altered to allow for a slowing earth and to put the charts in
sync with the actual placement of the Earth and Moon - not evident unless one tracks the trends.
2. leap seconds or fractions thereof were inserted into the master clock, to appear to keep the Earth on a 24 hour
day - not obvious unless one is a meticulous clock-watcher.
3. an explanation of why the search for Planet X was undertaken in the first place was proffered, as a nebulous
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p128.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:29 AM]
ZetaTalk: Trend Data
mathematical adjustment of various perturbation factors - none of which makes sense to a thinking man since
the perturbations still exist, as before.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p128.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:29 AM]
ZetaTalk: Not Obvious
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Not Obvious
Note: written during the Jan 7, 2003 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session.
Slowing of the Earth, for the common man, is not an easy affair to register. First, the Navy, as the Master Clock
holders of the world, control networks which computers synch to during the night, quickly bringing all networks into
sync with the Master Clock while the public sleeps. Businesses, finding their manual clocks out of sync, adjust to
match, as do employees noticing their watches are off. Even so-called atomic watches are watches that sync to the
Master Clock. The argument has been made that the true massive atomic clocks are not under the control of the US
Navy, but this is a fallacy as they are few, and in the hands of institutions that are under the thumb of the
establishment, as are those employed by major observatories. Few people need to be leaned on, and these people are
allowed into their positions based on their signed agreements not to threaten what might be called national or world
security issues, in other words, don't cause panic until we tell you it is OK to make an announcement. Enter the
common man, with his clocks and watches and PC's. A minute off here or there, and he adjusts without thinking. Who
remembers i
f the last time they tweaked their watch it was to set it a minute forward or backward? The common movie
line "synchronize watches" when going out on a closely coordinated operation indicates how often individual watches
might be off a bit. Thus, the common man will be accused of making it up, looking for attention, being confused, or
whatever should he assert that clocks and watches are too fast, by a minute or two, and increasingly so.
We have stated that the phases of the Moon will be one way to determine a slowdown. Where the Earth has a
magnetic core, and react to the approach of Planet X by a slowdown, the Moon has no magnetized liquid core and
cares not. Its slow turn, every 28 days, around the Earth is steady, but not so easy to anticipate that the common man
can determine just where to look for the Moon. First, the Moon has a 3 year cycle, and is further away or closer, faster
or slower, in going around the Earth based on this. This cycle, as noted by the Navy in their graphs, was adjusted in
1994 to pre-account for the slowdown now being experienced, so Moon phases would not be that quickly noticed.
Thus, from 1994 to about 2000, the Moon was late in arriving at the published phase, a point noted by someone
writing to Troubled Times with this information. But most among the common man, looking at their calendar for the
date of the Full Moon, will find the Full Moon pretty much on target, or appearing full, and the issue at this time is
whether it is coming later in the evening or earlier, and this is information not on the calendars.
But at some point, and we estimate this to come on or about April 1 (no April Fool's Joke intended) the Full Moon will
come a full day early, as the Earth's rotation since 1994, a lost minute here and there, will have caught up with the
Moon phases. These calendars have been republished, the dates given by the Navy long ago, so any attempt to change
them will be noted and can be compared against previously published calendars. However, in truth, by April 1, 2003
[Note: see 2003 Date explanation] or thereabouts, matters will be so anxious, so extreme, so insecure, for most of mankind, and the Red Star visible in the daytime sky, that mankind will scarcely be looking at the Moon for evidence. Thus, the
Navy effectively changed the Moon phases, on the calendars to be printed, in 1994. However, as noted on the Troubled
Times page re Slowing, the fact that they modified their graphics was palpable, evident, obvious. They did not think
that the public would notice, but they did, among Troubled Times members, and posted on sci.astro, and Nancy
included all in these pages, and there it is! The 3 year cycles of the Moon, wobbling askew, taking short dips, cutting
corners, and illogically so as the 50 year graphs show no such variations! Check it out! If you are looking for proof that
the establishment has been lying to you, there it is!.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p171.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:29 AM]
ZetaTalk: Countdown Minutes
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Countdown Minutes
written June 13, 2003
Last evening I drove out to the Bay here on the West Coast of Florida to observe the Sunset from my car. For awhile
it seemed as though the Sun was lingering above the ecliptic but then suddenly went below. However, the timing for
the sunset was not correct. Sunset is suppose to be at 8:40 PM according to the weather charts here but the Sun
actually broke the ecliptic at 8:21 PM or a difference of 19 minutes. On another note of interest it did not get totally
dark until 9:20 PM EST. Just a few days ago it was getting totally dark at around 9:00 PM so a differenc of 20
minutes there. Also the sunrise is later then it is suppose to be this time of year. The charts say 6:00 AM EST but the
actual time of Sunrise was at 6:18 AM or a difference of 18 minutes there. It seems rather strange to see such a
similarity in the differences of timing if in fact something out of the ordinary is occuring.
Given our refusal to give an exacting date for rotation
slowing or stopping, or the hour of the shift itself, many
have taken to anxiously checking the rising and setting
sun to determine if a few minutes of slowing has begun.
In this, confused results occur. During these last weeks,
Planet X is simultaneously.
1. coming in from the right of the Sun in a
retrograde orbit, about from the position of the
last coordinates given for early May, between the
constellations of Orion and Taurus,
2. coming up suddenly from a 32 degree drop under
the Ecliptic, which it made also in the last weeks,
3. moving toward the Earth for a close passage of 14 million miles.
What does this do to the light coming from the Sun to Earth? As we have mentioned repeatedly, light bends, is subject
to the influence of gravity or other particles flows, and exemplified by where your feet are when you stand in water
and look down upon them. The Auroras are not magnetic, they are light spreading into color spectrums based on their
sensitivity to gravity, a show that would normally be visible all over the world if the intense sunlight near the Equator
were not drowning this out. That the Auroras moved south during a time when human scientists were scratching their
heads over why the Earth seemed to have a fatter middle, per gravity analysis done by their probes, when no shape
change had occurred, proves this. Gravity flow intensified at the Equator, and the Auroras moved south.
The spreading orange of the sunrise and sunset likewise has zero to do with light scattering off dust, a ridiculous
human explanation as why would the dust be present only at those times? Orange is a predominance of a type or red
light spectrum wave that bends readily, and continues to bend when other light has moved on out into space, so
reaches your eye predominantly. Planet X, as we have stated, is predominantly in the red light spectrum, appeared
orange in early photos, and thus presented two personas during early imaging, one bending to gravity more than the
other, though both are in the red spectrum. But the propensity of light to bend for many reasons has affected more than
where Planet X is appearing, it has and is affecting where the Sun is appearing, particularly during the dawn and dusk
when orange or other red light spectrum rays predominate.
During the last few weeks, when Planet X is coming up between the Earth and Sun, it affects light traveling from the
Sun to Earth. The Repulsion Force, as we have explained, is like a fire hose of gravity particles escaping from a large
body such as a planet or sun. When two such large bodies come close, these fire hoses are pointed at each other and
stop the approach, thus large bodies keep their distance from each other. They likewise have a gravity draw upon each
other, each having gravity particles floating back toward their surfaces like a fine net that reaches far into space, so
http://www.zetatalk2.com/index/zeta6.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:30 AM]
ZetaTalk: Countdown Minutes
each is trying to draw the other in. There is a push and a pull, between large bodies. During the sunset and sunrise,
where predominately red light spectrum light is arriving at the human viewer, this red light has been subject to gravity
bending, and thus the sunset and sunrise can be an inaccurate gauge of rotation stoppage. What effects might occur?
When Planet X is coming up from its deep 32 degree dive below
the Ecliptic, it delivers a broadside to those li
ght rays in the red
light spectrum with the Repulsion Force fire hose, pushing those
away such that they arrive at Earth as though the Sun were
further distant. These rays arrive later, and seem to arrive from a
point away from Planet X, almost as though Planet X has pushed
the Sun which is of course not the case, Planet X, with its gravity
fire hose broadside, has pushed the red light rays. Many noticed that the sunset seemed to linger, the evening sky not
darkening for hours after the sunset, and this was the reason. Many noticed that the Sun seemed to rise or set too far
north, a similar phenomena where the Sun only appeared to be there.
When Planet X arrives close to the Ecliptic and starts moving
between the Earth and Sun, a second phenomenon occurs. Red
light bends toward Planet X as a gravity draw, such that for those
in the Northern Hemisphere the light affecting the sunrise and
sunset must come up over more the Earth’s fat middle, making the sunrise later and the sunset earlier, a shorter day,
the reverse of where it should be going into the Summer Solstice. For those in the Southern Hemisphere, the opposite
effect would occur, as they are dealing with less of Earth’s Fat middle, and have a longer day potential. Where this
phenomena depends upon the time of day and the location of the viewer, who may or may not experience this
confusion, it can confuse the issue of determining just when rotation slowing has started, those days when minutes are
lost, clearly, and then hours lost.
How to best measure then, if rotation slowing has started? Use the direct overhead light during high noon, as this light
is primarily outside of those spectrums that bend, and thus will be true. Use a manual clock, as the atomic clocks are
automatically set back to obscure the slowing process that has been seconds per day until lately. The slowing process
will be minutes only at first, rapidly building to hours during a day, then rapidly moving to a stoppage. On the day that
hours a day are presenting, the crust and core will be fighting, and this will translate to moaning and heavy earthquake