coloration of the surrounding area, just so the 12th Planet, to you, is camouflaged against the night sky. Its appearance
does not look like the familiar objects you set out to identify when you scan the sky - pin points with intense centers
that are stars or the scattered brilliance of an exploding star or the distinctive elongated fantail of a passing comet.
Where its size at present is akin to a star, and the diffuse light across its surface would indeed have the spread and
consistency that your reflecting planets do, there are significant differences that cause you to pass over it rather than
explore it in depth.
1. the composition is not the composition of reflecting sunlight, but is almost exclusively in the spectrum you
would call red light. Thus you will do best if you filter for red light, and by this we mean filtering out all but red
light.
2. though a large planet, 4 times as large as Earth and thus larger than Mars or Pluto, it is at this time at a much
greater distance and thus its visibility is not equivalent to Mars or Pluto.
The amateur astronomer may be disappointed until well after the millennium, as the 12th Planet's motions across the
skies are only visible at this time when repeated images are taken and compared by computer, and here the
magnification must be huge. Where the naked eye looks upon the sky, the 12th Planet appears to be standing still. The
path of the comet is dead on. It is aiming for your Sun, and you are so very close to your Sun. The Earth's movements
to this side or that are slight, in the scheme of things, and give to the comet an almost imperceptible wobble at best.
The naked eye will not see motion in this 12th Planet until well into the year of the cataclysms, just a few weeks
ahead. At that time its motion will give it away as being of a comet's nature. During the last few weeks, back yard
astronomers will be able to detect motion of the comet across the skies, something a distant star would not do. Those
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p29.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:23 AM]
ZetaTalk: Comet Visible
with telescopes and computer software capable of comparing captured and stored images will know otherwise, but will
be silenced or discredited in the usual establishment protective manner.
This 12th Planet will, however, get consistently brighter, so that an image taken now, compared with an image taken a
year from now, would show an increased brightness not expected from a distant star. The naked eye would not capture
this. The naked eye will begin to register increased brightness approximately 1 year 7 months before the cataclysms
[Note: see 2003 Date explanation. 1 year 7 months computes to May 15, 2003, a deliberate wrong date.], or late in the year 2001. This appearance will be discounted by most, who will point to the distortions in the atmosphere as a cause or will explain
this as an exploding star, the light rays of which are just becoming visible on Earth. Increased brightness will occur
gradually, so that without the capacity to register brightness over time, and compare closely the changes, this cannot be
proved or even, until close to the end, mentally registered by the observer. High powered equipment can and has
registered this increased brightness. The images must be compared by computer analysis, but the magnification need
not be huge, only slight. Here again, this information will not be made public. Quite the opposite. This information
will be denied and refuted by those controlling the high powered equipment needed for proof.
Astronomy is a science based on theory as much as fact, as needs be when one is looking out where one cannot go and
measure! Consequently, astronomers essentially make their best guess, and often disagree. How far away is an object?
Opinions differ. If one object passes in front of another, there is a solid clue, as the one object is obviously closer than
the other. What is the composition of an object? Extruded rays are analyzed against known scientific facts on how
matter decomposes, but much scientific fact is as yet not understood by humans. They make their best guess, often so
wrong as to be terribly misleading. We are not telling astronomers anything they don't know themselves. Theirs is a
science that truly respects the adage - the more I know, the more I know I don't know!
For those discouraged by peering at the sky, and in particular discouraged by the myriad of alternative explanations for
what is seen, remember that the approach of the comet is best measured, until the last year before the cataclysms, by
the Earth's response to its approach. As we have already explained, the core of the Earth is already responding, and
this measurement is recorded in the rising temperature of the oceans, worldwide. The next symptom to look for is
the Greenhouse effect. It is when the Earth receives red dust from the tail of the comet, as it enters the Solar System
and passes between the Sun and the Earth, that denial will no longer be possible. At this point, however, there are scant
days before the cataclysms.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p29.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:23 AM]
ZetaTalk: Fall, 2002
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Fall, 2002
Note: written during the Jun 22, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session.
Given the changes from February 2001 to January 2002, where the anxious public went from needing to go to an
observatory to view, to getting their hands on infrared imaging equipment to image, what can the public expect going
into Winter 2003? We described Planet X as dithering at the mid-point for most of its journey, and only barely moving
from this point even in 2000. Some motion was apparent in that many contactees were aware they could view the
inbound planet at observatories, in February 2001. Likewise, there was confidence in imaging in January 2002, where
discussion of this in February 2001 was not strong.
We have stated that the planet increases speed exponentially, on approach. Thus, humans attempting to put numbers to
our words, and ascertain distance, have created Charts. These are not our distance charts, but human charts. In fact,
there are some key errors in these charts, as where the planet increases speed exponentially, it also has points where it
slows. Thus, taking off from the mid-point, the dither point, is faster than the human chart anticipates. The approach, to
the edge of the solar system, is thus faster than expected. But the Repulsion Force clicks in at the edge of the Solar
System. Why would it not? What do you suppose is keeping those outer planets from floating into the Sun? Thus, the
brakes come on about 7 weeks ahead of the shift [Note: see 2003 Date explanation], when it enters the outer solar system edges. It is going slower, when passing through the orbit of Saturn, edge to edge, than it was upon approach! Thus, a
rapid increase in size and visibility as in brightness will occur during the Fall of 2002 and into the Winter months
following.
To anticipate just when amateurs can with assurance see Planet X in the night sky, look at the image taken on January
19th in France. Compare the blur that is Planet X to neighboring stars. If, before dawn, in the hour and hours before
dawn, you cannot see all these stars clearly, then you surely cannot see Planet X clearly. Attempts are being made to
convince the American public that viewing can occurs as early as July, but this is a known falsehood. Those behind
this disinformation, or should we say lack of information, are hoping a large hooting and name calling sessions
prolongs the period when the elite will be safe from demands for information. ZetaTalk discredited, not by our words,
but by the words of others assuring amateurs that they can see it in July, or August. Was it not last year at this time,
that Charlene was ridiculed by David Tholen for trying to sight Planet X pre-dawn? His ridicule was for her, but lets
now turn this on Open Minded, who is proposing the same thing! What is good for the goose, is good for the gander.
Thus, we suggest that Viewing in Fall, at the earliest, be the rule and rumor, not Summer viewing, which is quite
impossible given the nature of the object, Planet X, and the red light spectrum it is viewed within.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p155.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:23 AM]
ZetaTalk: Amateur Scopes
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Amateur Scopes
Note: Imaging of Planet X at our coordinates began in the Fall of 2002, and raised questions among those analyzing the FITS files from the
CCD cameras used in an amateur scopes. These answers were provided during the Oct 5, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session.
Does Moon light create light pollution for viewing?
Light being imaged from Planet X is not subject to light pollution from the Sun, when taken well before dawn,
even when the Moon is full. Moon light, where strong enough to reflect back to Earth so that man can walk
paths without a beacon light in his hands, nonetheless is not reflecting out to affect objects in space. Does this
Moon light affect a camera, such that dim objects might be blurred by Moon light? No, as it is diffuse in the
camera, affected perhaps only 5% of the available light from other objects in space. Unless an object is at the
threshold of visibility, to be affected by that 5% into not registering at all, it would not be affected by a full
Moon.
Why is Planet X showing twice, as a red light object and a white light object?
Planet X is registering in two places on human CCD camera images of late - a red object bent from the
coordinate spot and a white light object at the coordinates we have given. How long will this phenomena occur
for the inbound Planet X? Planet X, as we have stated from the beginning, is a red light spectrum object, due to
the iron ore dust swirl surrounding it. Light emanating from it must bounce through the dust swirl, and in the
manner of light particles, emerges from the swirl colored to red from the influence of the iron ore. Until Planet X
reaches the edge of the solar system, the orbit of Pluto or thereabouts, it will continue to present two objects,
both increasingly large and bright as the months pass. It is when the distance is such that little bending occurs
that they will blend, become one object, a gradual progression of becoming closer and closer in images and
scopes.
Why don’t red stars bend due to red light bending?
We have stated that there are many more particles of light than man is aware of, and light spectrums likewise he
is unaware of. Man sees but few colors, our eyes able to see dozens more, and our equipment attuned to wider
spectrums likewise. If the light from Planet X bends, then why is this not the case for all objects, such as red
stars, that they might appear in two places? Red Stars appear red because of a different spectrum in the red
frequencies. In other words, there is red light, and red light, and red light. Mankind does not understanding the
full spectrum or behavior. The red light from Planet X is not the composition of light that must travel a long way
through space! Planet X is relatively close, and thus its red light, bent, is still available upon reaching Earth. Red
light in this spectrum from a distant object would be lost, before reaching Earth.
Am I seeing more than one Planet X, in a red light, on an image?
Planet X is appearing as a red light object in only one spot on the images, and what is commonly termed white
light appearing at the coordinates spot given. However, there can be ghosts, caused by reflection, that can appear
near an object. This is a complex subject related to atmosphere, camera function, and even Moon bounce, so we
decline to expand upon it. Suffice it to say that you should look for the strongest red object in accordance with
what is expected in coordinates motion, and in relation to the white light object which should be at the
coordinates, and in accordance with latitude and time of exposure, etc. Consider any ghosts you pick up to be
that.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p165.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:24 AM]
ZetaTalk: Coordinates
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Coordinates
Note: written during the Live ZeatTalk IRC session on Dec 3, 2001.
We have explained that the inbound Planet X is primarily on a straight line path inbound. The appearance of bobbling
about is slight in its path, as during the inbound motion it can move slightly to the side or up or down, while not
disturbing its primary forward motion. This is akin to a car on the highway, which might move a bit to pass another
car or avoid a dead animal on the road, while still moving almost exclusively forward. The view from the front, versus
the view from the side, is different, and deceptive. However, there are other reasons our Coordinates change, often
from week to week. Planet X is viewed from the surface of Earth, and in this the light from the planet and its moons
and dust cloud must travel toward Earth and encounters many obstacles. What is little dealt with by the common man
is the degree to which light particles are deflected. They are aware that their feet seem to be displaced from their legs
when they stand in water and look down, but this phenomena does not translate to viewing the heavens because their
leadership in the scientific community does little to educate or assist them. If water can bend light rays in this manner,
what do you suppose the atmosphere or solar wind or influence of the other planets in the system might have?
We calculate these influences, and come up with a set of coordinates on any given day that will enable an eager viewer
to seek out and find this inbound monster, from any part of the globe. We are taking in this the common ground such
that any viewpoint on the globe will not be that far from the coordinates. Thus, for any given viewpoint, the
coordinates will most likely not be correct, but will be close. Which is why we state look around the spot. For the
amateur, used to star light which enters the atmosphere in such intensity that even when most of the light rays are
deflected, there are some coming directly to the scope, this is a foreign concept. However, infrared and primarily red
spectrum light is more easily bent, which is why your sunsets are a brilliant orange. As we have explained, these are
bent rays, not visible during the day when they are drown out by other rays, but visible when given exclusive presence
on the stage.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com
http://www.zetatalk2.com/poleshft/p138.htm[2/5/2012 9:56:25 AM]
ZetaTalk: Sighting Success
Mail this Pageto a Friend.
ZetaTalk: Sighting Success
Note: written during the Apr 19, 2003 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session.
During the recent weeks when Planet X was in the evening sky long enough to avoid light pollution, many looked for
it in the skies and saw something. Those educated, who had done their homework and followed the imaging session,
noted our words as to what to look for, and oriented themselves in the sky saw it 68% of the time. This also required
them to persevere, as it winked in and out, faded and then reappeared, and often the Red Persona was stronger than the
White Persona, which positions itself on the coordinates. For those not seeing it, they were either rushed and could
only spend a moment or were looking just past the time when it would be visible, or were in areas not clear of light
pollution, being near large cities or the like. For those who looked, but were unsure of where to look, had not done
their homework or oriented themselves, only about 6 % saw it. They were invariably shocked, and the impact greater
in these individuals than those who already had been following the imaging.
The countries affected by sightings are far greater in number than the public following sci.astro or message board
would even suppose. Those viewing it, seeing the punishment that Nancy and the Sighting Team undergo, have talked
among themselves but kept their identity secret, not on the Internet which they are sure is being monitored. The
number of countries spans every continent, and runs into the dozens. The effect of these sightings, and the rumor mills
that carry the word like wildfire in the communities affected, and all communities that get word of the sightings, is
vast. The general public begins to look, and will continue to look as the quake uptick become discernible even to those
without access to quake statistics. The weather, the quakes, the increasing illness, the devastated economies world
wide, the highly aggressive behavior of the US and Britain to gain control of oil fields, all these are far larger signs
that something is coming than any denial from official media or government sources. In short, the people have come to
rely upon themselves, and to ignore the media and government statements, all for the better.
All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com