between, then encroachers upon Canaan’s stable
cities and cultures, the Hebrews needed the most
vicious and threatening deity possible: both to
terrorize their own, loosely-knit membership into
cohesiveness and to propagandistically overcome
any sponsoring gods of invaded communities. And
so they adopted El.
a. Appropriations
Supporting stories, as needed to impress and
intimidate the ignorant and gullible, began as
corrupted fragments of pre-existing Canaanite,
Babylonian, and Egyptian polytheistic legends,
66 Haggard, Sir H. Rider, She and Allan, 1921. The Second
Book of Ayesha, Leonaur Press, page #157.
67 From Old French Ebreu, via Latin from late Greek Hebraios,
from Aramaic ῾ib ray, Hebrew ῾ib rî “beyond the river”.
- 150 -
gradually coalescing into the Holy Bible’s “Old
Testament”, absent either the crediting to or
educational morality of these sources. 68
A further Hebraic corruption - Dualism - was
also appropriated, again imprecisely, from Persian
Zoroastrianism (after Zarathustra, ca. 600 BCE); it
involves a conflict between two opposing forces of
the cosmos - in Persia Ahura Mazda vs. Ahriman,
and later in Hebrew imitation El vs. Satan. 69
b. Xodus
If you thought you saw even a correct timeline
in Cecil B. DeMille’s The Ten Commandments, think
again: Neither Pharaoh Seti I nor his son Rameses II
imprisoned a nation of Hebrew slaves, and Rameses
didn’t lose either his army to the Red Sea or his son
to an El-slaughter of Egypt’s firstborn. 70
Nor did any of this occur during Rameses II’s
reign:
68 Cf. Gerald Massey, A Book of the Beginnings (Seacaucus,
NJ: University Books, 1974). This work was the first of his
series on the topic. Among the topics addressed: Egyptian
origins of practically every Hebrew and Christian myth, and
Egyptian origin of the Hebrew language. Massey followed this
2-volume work with two more equally-extensive sets, Natural
Genesis and Ancient Egypt, further developing and
documenting this information.
69 While in original Persian Dualism the powers and influence
of Ahura Mazda and Ahriman constituted a divine balance, the
Hebrews and their Christian/Islamic variations, have never
been able to resolve the dilemma of a supposedly omnipotent
and good El with the existence of evil; the dilemma of theodicy.
70 Rameses II was succeeded by Merenptah, the fourth son of
his second wife, simply because by age 90 he had outlived all of
his older sons.
- 151 -
Hard evidence of the Exodus event in the
preserving deserts of the Sinai, where most of the
biblical Wandering takes place, is similarly elusive.
Although its climate has preserved the
tiniest traces of ancient Bedouin encampments
and the sparse, 5,000-year-old villages of mine-
workers, there is not a single trace of Moses or the
Israelites.
And they would have been by far the largest
body of ancient people ever to have lived in this
great wilderness.
Neither is there any evidence that Sinai and
its little natural springs could ever have supported
such a multitude, even for a single week.
Several 19th-Century vicars recognized this
fact within a day or two of the start of numerous
expeditions in search of Moses’ footsteps.
“Escaping from the rigours of an English
winter,” as one of them says, “in a land of the flock
and the tent to which our only guide was the Bible”
they quickly realized that the biblical Exodus was
logistically impossible and that the Bible was a
most ambiguous guide to that desolate region.
The biblical description of the Exodus, then,
flies in the face of practical experience. Indeed the
closer you examine it, the further it seems
removed from all of ancient history.” 71
As for the Ten Commandments, El borrowed
their content from the Egyptian-Hittite Treaties of
1274 BCE ...
The prologue of the Hittite treaty reminds
the Hittite king’s vassals of his benevolent acts..
(compare with Exodus 20:2 “I am the LORD your
God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out
of the house of slavery.”).
The Hittite treaty also stipulated the
obligations imposed by the ruler on his vassals,
which included a prohibition of relations with
peoples outside the empire, or enmity between
71 Romer, John, Testament. New York: Henry Holt, 1988, page
#58.
- 152 -
those within.” ( Exodus 20:3: “You shall have no
other gods before Me.”).
Viewed as a treaty rather than a law code, its
purpose is not so much to regulate human affairs
as to define the scope of the king’s power. 72
... but didn’t get around to his own version until at
least the 7th Century BCE. 73 This would have
corresponded to the [Kushite] XXV Dynasty of the
Third Intermediate Period; Seti I & Rameses II were
of the [Setian] XIX Dynasty (1290-1197 BCE).
c.
RedEmption
If you’re unlucky enough to be one of El’s
Chosen People (the Hebrews>Jews), you’re headed
for the extremely unpleasant Sheol when you croak,
and that’s all there is to it.
So when Jesus and Mohammed promised
Original Sinners a way out, they instantly got an
attentive audience.
And it sounded like a good deal: All you had to
do was obey one of them, not El directly.
“They”, institutionalized as churches and
mosques, were nice as long as you unquestioningly
obeyed and paid taxes to support them.
d. Exodus 22:18
If you weren’t interested, or chose the wrong
Redeemer for your locale, you had the choice of
either converting or being tortured and killed: in the
72 Bright, John, A History of Israel (4th Edition). Philadelphia:
Westminster Press, 1972, pages #165-70.
73 Finkelstein, Israel & Silberman, Neil Asher, The Bible
Unearthed. New York: Touchstone, 2002, page #70.
- 153 -
Christian Roman Empires, Dark Ages Europe, the
Crusades, the genocidal wars of the Protestant
Reformation and Catholic CounterReformation, and
the Renaissance.
If you happed to be a native of the Western
Hemisphere or Pacific-rim Asia, Christian
missionaries were quick to exterminate or enslave
“Heathens” from the moment Columbus arrived.
Islam cut just as bloody a swath where it
advanced around the Mediterranean, Africa, the
Middle East, and southern Asia.
All of which has continued, past the European
“Enlightenment”, to the genocidal religious wars of
the 21st century: Shiite against Sunni Muslims,
Jewish Israel against Muslim Palestine,
Indian
Hindus against Pakistani Muslims, and Buddhist
Myanmar against Muslim Rohingya.
In the interest of fairness, here is a list of not
just worldwide genocides, but even the smallest
wars or massacres perpetrated by Satanists/Setians
throughout history: [ ].
Not just this striking contrast, but the scourge,
persistence, and viciousness of nonSatanic religious
violence speaks directly to the reason: insecurity in
nonSatanic religious belief. In short, if you have
little or no confidence in the validity of your chosen
or compelled religion, even the existence of
alternatives is an unacceptable threat and must be
eliminated one way or another.
Satanists/Setians feel no such insecurity,
because this religion is based on solid premises. The
existence, even the prevalence of the profane is thus
a matter of disinterest, or, if considered emotionally,
nuisance or pity.
Profane religious neurosis and violence force
attention only when, as in the Salem witch-hunts or
- 154 -
the 1980s’ international “Satanic Panic” pogroms,
degenerate profane fantasies concerning this
religion explode into open violence and attempted
extermination.
Ironically profane ignorance is so widespread
that the victims of such vigilantism are more often
than not innocent bystanders who know no more
about authentic Satanism than their Inquisitors.
e. CabalEmption
At least Christians and Muslims could now
breathe easier: All you had to do to qualify for
Heaven instead of Sheol was to surrender your will
to Jesus’ or Mohammed’s representatives and
convert or exterminate as many heathens and
heretics as you could reach.
But El’s Chosen People, the Jews, not only
didn’t have this promise, even if they kill every last
Palestinian and “intrusive” Syrian, Lebanese,
Egyptian, and American74 inconvenient to “Greater
Israel”. Comments Arthur Schopenhauer in Parega
#I, 13:
The Jewish religion proper, as described and
taught in Genesis and all the historic books until
the end of Chronicles, is the crudest of all religions
because it is the only one which has no theory of
immortality - not even a trace of it. Every king and
every hero or prophet is buried, when he dies, with
his fathers, and there is an end of the matter; no
trace of any existence after death; indeed, as if
74 On 6/8/1967 the Israel air force & navy attempted to sink
the U.S.S. Liberty research ship in international waters,
planning to blame it on Egypt. Annoyingly for Israel, some of
the American sailors survived to expose this “false flag”
operation.
- 155 -
intentionally, every thought of this sort seems to
have been removed.
But Schopenhauer is only partially correct.
According to Hebrew theology, the soul - which is an
animating force common to animals as well as
humans - survives as a “shade” which endures
eternal imprisonment in a dark, dismal prison called
Sheol, from which there is no escape, redemption, or
resurrection. Whether the soul-being was virtuous
or vicious in life makes no difference; Sheol awaits
all.
But wait! If El hasn’t sent Jews a Redeemer as
he has Christians and Muslims, might there be a way
for them to escape Sheol by redeeming
themselves?
In the 13th Century CE Jews [and uncertain
Christians] were offered a new hope for non-
Messianic redemption from both Adam & Eve’s
Original & their own additional sins. The Spanish
Jew Moses de León authored a series of books, the
Zohar (“Splendor”), claiming to reveal divine
mysteries concealed in the Torah.
The mysticism contained in the Zohar is known
as [Hebrew] Cabala (aka “Kabbalah”, “Qabala”,
etc.). The word means “aligned” or “corresponding”,
and purported to chart an initiatory pathway to
redemption by personal effort alone. Desperate
Jews, as well as similarly-motivated Freemasons,
Rosicrucians, Theosophists, and Thelemites eagerly
made the Cabala the core of their teachings.
Moses de León ascribing the Zohar to the 2nd-
Century rabbi Shimon bar Yochai, who hid in a cave
for thirteen years studying the Torah and was
inspired by the prophet Elijah to write the Zohar.
Unfortunately León’s widow confessed that her
husband had written it, using the prophet for profit.
- 156 -
This trifling quibble seems not to bother the legions
of Cabaloyalists, however. 75
f.
TauTheology
In “Might is Right” Arthur Desmond waxes
particularly vehement on the subject of lies:
The most dangerous of all enthroned lies is
the holy, the sanctified, the privileged lie - the lie
that everybody believes to be a model truth.
It is the fruitful mother of all other popular
errors and delusions. It is hydra-headed. It has a
The lie that is known to be a lie is half-
eradicated, but the lie that even intelligent persons
regard as a sacred fact - the lie that has been
inculcated around a mother’s knee - is more
dangerous to contend against than a creeping
pestilence.
Popular lies have ever been the most potent
enemies of personal liberty. There is only one way
to deal with them: Cut them out, to the very core,
just as cancers are. Exterminate them root and
branch, or they will surely eat us all up. We must
annihilate them, or they will us.
We have seen that the vaguely/mysteriously
impressive “God” turns out to be nothing more than
just one of a number of savage, sadistic Canaanite
idols, first appearing millennia after far more
benign, articulate, and educational cosmological
principles such as the Platonic/Pythagorean Forms
and the Egyptian neteru.
Without exception the “wisdom” attributed to
El turns out to be plagiarisms at best, malicious
deceits at worst.
75 Funk & Wagnalls, Jewish Encyclopedia.
- 157 -
The history of El-worship is an unrelenting
bloodbath of torture and murder through the
centuries, in return for which this god promises its
servants an afterdeath eternity of nightmare in the
desolation and misery of Sheol.
But before the Satanist can apply “Ragnar’s”
remedy to El, the two “proofs of his existence” most
commonly advanced by his cultists must be
demolished - which is not in the least difficult:
Both “proofs” relate to the cosmological
conglomerate of interrelated matter and energy: the
Objective Universe (OU).
The first proof, most famously advanced by
Thomas Aquinas in his Summa Theologica (still the
doctrinal backbone of the Catholic Church), is an
attempted application of Aristotle’s “unmoved
mover” proposition: that if the OU exists, something
had to create it.
That sounds reasonable, but actually isn’t.
There is no reason to assume that existence follows
nonexistence. The existence of the OU may just as
logically extend infinitely into the past and future,
requiring no creator. 76
It is to “pre-substantiate” this argument that
Judaism arbitrarily insists upon a cosmology of
“linear time”, which requires a theoretical starting-
point as well as ending-point: “In the beginning,”
states “Genesis” - whereupon everyone from Adam
to Albert Einstein is expected to salivate and salute.
76 This principle - that there is no necessity nor cause for
existence per se - was most famously expressed by French
novelist Jean-Paul Sartre. The protagonist of his Nausea is
horrified by the inexplicability of his own, hence the entire
OU’s existence - ultimately being forced to admit that no
“explanation”, no creative agency or rationale, is inherently
necessary. [This is the core premise of Existentialism.]
- 158 -
But as the Egyptian sages recognized from their
earliest astronomy 77, time (4D) is actually an
arbitrary measure of convenience internal to OU
phenomena; it does not exist objectively beyond it.
Therefore the cherished syllogism that the
existence of the OU requires El as a creator collapses
as a tautological fallacy.
A second argument, obviously much more
fanciful since it requires Biblical or testimonial faith,
involves the existence of “miracles”: isolated
instances of NL violations that would thereby
require the interjection of an intelligence superior
and external to that NL. Examples would be the
parting of the Red Sea by El (not Mr. DeMille),
Jesus’ post-crucifixion revivals, or more currently
the claimed miracles “by El through” Mother Teresa
and Father Junipero Serra qualifying them for
Catholic Church canonization as saints.