N-Space

  “The paradigm SF personality of the last several decades.”

  —Gregory Benford

  “The premier hard SF writer of the day.”

  —The Baltimore Sun

  “His tales have grit, authenticity, colorful characters and pulse-pounding narrative drive. Niven is a true master!”

  —Frederik Pohl

  On a Los Angeles talk show, Arthur C. Clarke was once asked to name his favorite writer. His immediate answer: “Larry Niven.”

  Author of such classics as Tales of Known Space, The Ringworld Engineers, and The Integral Trees; co-author of bestsellers like The Mote in God’s Eye, Lucifer’s Hammer, and Dream Park; Nebula winner and five-time recipient of SF’s Hugo award, Larry Niven is known to millions as the premier modern author of rigorous, scientifically consistent “hard” SF, the champion of “SF without a net.”

  Now Larry Niven has assembled a retrospective collection from all phases of his remarkable career. Included are classic hard-SF tales like “Inconstant Moon,” relentless extrapolations like “All the Myriad Ways,” and hitherto-uncollected works like the novella “The Kiteman.” Here also are Niven’s own essays on SF, writing, and the way of the world, like “Building the Mote in God’s Eye” and “Down in Flames,” previously unpublished in book form. And throughout the book run Niven’s own remarks, comments, and afterthoughts to each piece presented—a wealth of anecdotes and observations from nearly three decades in the wonderful world of science fiction.

  Rich with gossip, storytelling vigor, and sheer science-fictional fun, this is a book for SF lovers on the order of Robert A. Heinlein’s collection-cum-memoir Expanded Universe, or the autobiographies of Isaac Asimov—a compelling distillation of SF’s sense of wonder in its purest form.

  Larry Niven lives in Tarzana, California.

  This is a work of fiction. All the characters and events portrayed in this book are fictitious, and any resemblance to real people or events is purely coincidental.

  N-SPACE

  Copyright © 1990 by Larry Niven

  All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this book, or portions thereof, in any form.

  Verses from “We Can’t Find,” copyright © 1987 by Jane A. Robinson, were used with the author’s permission. All rights reserved.

  A Tor Book

  Published by Tom Doherty Associates, Inc.

  49 West 24th Street

  New York, N.Y. 10010

  Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

  Niven, Larry.

  N-space / Larry Niven.

  p. cm.

  ISBN 0-312-85089-1

  I. Title.

  PS3564.I9N18 1990

  813'.54—dc20

  90-38888

  CIP

  Printed in the United States of America

  First edition: September 1990

  0 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

  Book design by Jaye Zimet.

  C O N T E N T S

  Introduction: The Maker of Worlds by Tom Clancy

  On Niven (by David Brin, Gregory Benford, Wendy All, John Hertz, Steven Barnes, and Frederik Pohl)

  Dramatis Personae

  Foreword: Playgrounds for the Mind

  From WORLD OF PTAVVS

  Bordered in Black

  Convergent Series

  All the Myriad Ways

  From A GIFT FROM EARTH

  For a Foggy Night

  The Meddler

  Passerby

  Down in Flames

  From RINGWORLD

  The Fourth Profession

  “Shall We Indulge in Rishathra?” (with cartoons by William Rotsler)

  Man of Steel, Woman of Kleenex

  Inconstant Moon

  What Can You Say about Chocolate Covered Manhole Covers?

  Cloak of Anarchy

  From PROTECTOR

  The Hole Man

  Night on Mispec Moor

  Flare Time

  The Locusts (with Steven Barnes)

  From THE MOTE IN GOD’S EYE (with Jerry Pournelle)

  Building The Mote in God’s Eye (with Jerry Pournelle)

  Brenda

  The Return of William Proxmire

  The Tale of the Jinni and the Sisters

  Madness Has Its Place

  Niven’s Laws

  The Kiteman

  The Alien in Our Minds

  Space

  Bibliography of Larry Niven

  N - S P A C E

  INTRODUCTION

  THE MAKER OF WORLDS

  BY TOM CLANCY

  Some years ago, when I was still dreaming about becoming that special breed of cat called “author,” I had a birthday coming up and my wife was out of ideas. I told her to check out the bookstores for any book by Larry Niven except the three I’d already acquired. I don’t remember how many Wanda returned with, but I do know that I still read them periodically.

  One of the bad things about being a writer (and there are many) is that when writing a novel, you often find it impossible to read someone else’s novel. Some evil agency inside your brain takes note of the fact that you are reading instead of writing and forbids you to read more than thirty or forty pages. So, often you go back to vegetating in front of the TV because you can only write so much in a day, and the reason you picked up that book in the first place is to get your mind off what you were doing that morning. Writing is, therefore, both a form of compulsive behavior and, I frequently tell people, a self-induced form of mental illness. Those few writers who don’t start off by being a little nuts soon get that way as a direct result of their vocation.

  When I find myself in desperate need of removing my mind from THE PLOT so that I can look at it just a little more objectively the next day, my helper and pshrink is Larry Niven. For some reason, my brain does not recognize him as a threat to my compulsion.

  The scope of Larry’s work is so vast that only a writer of supreme talent could disguise the fact as well as he does. He doesn’t just set up a cute little story of ETs or interplanetary war. Not Larry—he builds a complete universe. Oh, sure, he keeps the galaxy pretty much as we know it (or think we know it), but he peoples it with whole sets of civilizations, some active, some extinct, all interrelated somehow or other. Now, that’s a pretty tall order, and if you’re not careful how you go about it, the reader would soon be overwhelmed by the background and have trouble catching on to the story itself. But not with Larry. With little more than an occasional oh, by the way he sets all the scenery in place and then gets on with his tale, which is always a story with an interesting point and a fairly tight focus embellished by the scenery instead of being dominated by it.

  And this ain’t easy. Trust me, I write for a living, too.

  All authors get fan mail, some good, and some not so good. There are two kinds that really matter. The stuff you get from kids is very special. Kids who read for recreation, and then have the audacity actually to write a letter to the author (I never did) are something that always touches you. These kids will go on to accomplish things, and it’s rather nice to think that you’ve influenced them a little bit. Next best is the mail you occasionally get from fellow writers. To be read by someone in the same line of work—and the worst thing about being a writer is that it really murders your reading—is rather like being a fighter pilot and having a beer handed to you by another fighter pilot. Your basic good feeling. I expect that Larry gets a lot of such letters. In the times when I need to escape from inside my head and relax, Larry’s the guy who relaxes me. As I suspect he does with a lot of others. Thanks, pal.

  • • •

  ON NIVEN

  The first time I met Larry Niven I accused him, in a jocular way, of stealing some of my best ideas and publishing them before I had even had them. For instance, I rea
d PROTECTOR about a year after I’d had the idea about why immortality in an individual would never make sense. There happen to be powerful Darwinistic reasons for people to die and get out of the way and stop breeding. However, Larry had already taken this notion, explored it so thoroughly that, in effect, no one could ever explore that territory again without tipping his hat to Larry. This is actually a fairly rapacious thing to do. If you think that the territory of notions is limited, then the hard sf writer is like a wildcat miner drilling out resources that are shrinking. For whatever it’s worth, some people think that way. A lot of sf writers aren’t writing hard science fiction because they think most of it has been written. If their reasoning is true—and I don’t think it is—one of the reasons is that you have writers like Larry Niven out there mining out whole veins and leaving nothing left for the rest of us to explore.

  In hard science fiction originality is especially prized. If you’re the first to explore a certain idea, a new technology—black holes, neutron stars—you get a fair amount of acclaim. But for Niven it’s not enough to be the first. He has to also be last. That is his attitude, and in a sense it is a very aggressive attitude.

  So in the end we writers revere Larry Niven, even though he makes our jobs harder. He not only mines all these marvelous veins of ideas, he mines them to exhaustion.

  —David Brin

  I met Larry in the mid-1960s, when he was just starting as a writer. Like many of us he began shakily, unsure of many aspects of his craft, but absolutely firm in the realm of ideas. He knew what he thought and felt a solid assurance.

  I saw in him then a facet I’ve witnessed since in many university students: a love for the scientific worldview, but an impatience with the humdrum daily grind of science itself as universities too often present the field. Larry always liked the big picture, the supple intersection of ideas. After Cal-Tech and his mathematics degree, he seemed to feel an urge for larger landscapes.

  I suspect many sf writers encounter such a moment, which becomes the launching point for careers. Poul Anderson finished his degree in physics and then turned not to ornate calculations but to a typewriter. This desire to sing rather than walk the pedestrian pathways of science is all to the good: we need our bards. Indeed, perhaps we need them more than we need more careful but closed thinkers.

  Many science fiction readers are similar sorts. Larry was a breath of Campbellian clarity in the New Wave murk, and he is the natural voice of a whole segment of the scientific-technical community, irreplaceable and golden. Long may he sing!

  —Gregory Benford

  The first time I read Larry Niven? It was in college just before a chemistry exam. I discovered these Larry Niven books and read straight through them instead of studying for the exam.

  I eventually got to meet him, and I’ve known Larry ever since—about fifteen years now (longer if you count knowing him through his books). I think my favorite thing about Larry personally is that he always has time for people. If you show an interest in him or what he does, he’s always ready to listen to you—I mean listen intently. You never feel as if you have just a little bit of his attention. He puts his whole self into listening and talking.

  There are a lot of science fiction writers who frighten fans. Fans are actually scared of them. Larry’s never been that way. Never.

  —Wendy All

  Larry is probably the most beloved pro in the science fiction fan world. Panels in which he is participating, parties at which he is likely to appear, are thronged. With good reason. He says wonderful things. He is truly congenial (which few science fiction pros are). People like to be around him.

  —John Hertz

  About 11 years ago I’d done a lot of writing but the only payment I’d received was something like ⅕ of a cent a word or payment in contributor’s copies. Still I considered myself a writer.

  So one day I’m in the club house of the Los Angeles Science Fiction Society, and Larry Niven walks in. When Larry walks in, you understand, he is completely surrounded by the people there. It’s like he’s a god, and this is his domain.

  I walked up to him and said: “Hello, Mr. Niven, my name’s Steven Barnes, and I’m a writer.”

  He took a puff on his pipe, looked at me and said: “Okay, tell me a story.”

  I just about died. But it so happened I’d sent out a story earlier that day about a compulsive gambler who pawns his pacemaker, and somehow I stumbled through it.

  After that we started talking. He seemed kind of reserved, but even then I could see he was still in touch with his child-personality. I could especially see it in his eyes. In some ways it was as if the beard and pipe were props to convince you that, yes, these are the badges of adulthood. But back there were these little boy’s eyes.

  I asked him if he’d read a story, and he said he would, and the next week I gave him an envelope containing three. I saw him the week following and asked if he had read them, and he said, yes, Jerry Pournelle and he had both read them. He said he was intrigued and asked me whether I’d be interested in looking at a story he’d tried writing ten years before and hadn’t been able to complete to his satisfaction.

  Thank God the problems with the story had nothing to do with astrophysics or any of the technical things that Larry is a master of. They had to do with the way the human beings were relating to one another, and I was able to fix it.

  We’ve been collaborating ever since.

  The imperative for men in our culture is that they must go out and create—work, produce, change the land around them. Now people often think that it’s easy when you have a lot of money handed to you as a kid, as Larry had. All that does is say to you that the chances are very good you’ll never live up to the man who created all that wealth.

  But Larry created a career separate from anything his family had handed him. He could have taken their money and lain by the side of the pool and vegetated or put it into land or condominiums and made a lot of money. And, indeed, he has made money off the money his father handed him. But the most important thing Larry did was to go out and define a whole new world. If his world in California had already been conquered, then Larry would create new worlds to conquer and people them with his own creations.

  —from a conversation with Steven Barnes

  Since I happened to be the lucky editor who published Larry Niven’s first story, I’ve been asked to tell a little bit about him, which I’m glad to do. Let me tell you about that first story…but forgive me if I start by explaining something about my own editorial practices.

  When I was editing Galaxy and If in the 1960s I had made it a condition of employment that no one was to expect me to spend much time in the office of the publishing company. I was willing to appear now and then—one afternoon a week wasn’t objectionable—but that was as far as I would go. Between times I had an assistant to sit at a desk in the office for the purpose of answering the telephone and dealing with whatever routine things had to be dealt with. (For most of that time my assistant was a young woman named Judy-Lynn Benjamin, later Judy-Lynn del Rey, who went on to considerably better things later on—Del Rey Books is named after her.) One of Judy-Lynn’s jobs was to go through the week’s accumulations of unsolicited manuscripts by unknown writers (unflatteringly called “the slush pile”) for me. She wasn’t to read them—I have always read everything that was submitted to me myself, on the grounds that, as Frank Munsey once said, no magazine can survive the mistakes of more than one person—but Judy-Lynn took the stories out of the envelopes they arrived in, clipped rejection slips on them, put them in return envelopes with postage attached and stacked them up, unsealed, for me to pick up when I came in. Then, in the smoking car of the train back to the Jersey Shore each week, I read the fifty or a hundred stories that had turned up in that week’s slush. There would generally be a handful that required some sort of letter to the author, and, if I was very lucky, one or two that I could actually buy. All the rest I sealed up and dropped into the mailbox at the Red Ban
k train station, and that was the end of that. One doesn’t expect much out of the slush, you see. One is generally right about that, too.

  So it was on just such a train ride, somewhere between Newark and Matawan, that I pulled out of its envelope a slim little manuscript called “The Coldest Place,” by some previously unknown person who said his name was Larry Niven.

  That manuscript didn’t get mailed back. “The Coldest Place” wasn’t a great story. But it had a number of good things going for it. It started with a clever science-based idea—the “coldest place” of the title, paradoxically, was on the dark side of the very hottest planet in the solar system, Mercury—and the writing was competent enough, and besides the story was beautifully short. (I was always particularly looking for short stories, because—since we paid by the word—all those savvy professional writers had learned early that they ate better if they wrote long ones.)

  So I kept that story out, and wrote a letter to the author saying I would be happy to buy it (for very little money, to be sure), and asked him a few questions about himself. And by return mail he answered that he’d take the offer and, yes, he had never sold a story before so I could call it a “first.” I put the check through, and marked it up for the printer, and all was well.

  Or so I thought.

  You never know, though, do you? There was a wholly unexpected development. Just at that time some busybody scientists, who should have found some more productive use for their time, were conducting radar studies of Mercury. They came up with the surprising (and just at that moment really unwelcome) information that the planet did not always present the same face to the Sun, as everyone (including Larry and I) had always thought. The damn thing revolved. It didn’t have a “coldest place.”

  It was evident that Larry Niven read the same journals as I did, because a day or two later I got a worried letter from him to say that he’d just discovered his story had turned out to be scientifically wrong, and should he give the money back?