A Fortunate Man: The Story of a Country Doctor
John Berger
ALSO BY JOHN BERGER
To the Wedding
Into Their Labours
(Pig Earth, Once in Europa, Lilac and Flag: A Trilogy)
A Painter of Our Time
Permanent Red
The Foot of Clive
Corker’s Freedom
Art and Revolution
The Moment of Cubism and Other Essays
The Look of Things: Selected Essays and Articles
Ways of Seeing
Another Way of Telling
A Seventh Man
G.
About Looking
And Our Faces, My Heart, Brief as Photos
Keeping a Rendezvous
A
Fortunate
Man
The Story of a Country Doctor
John Berger
Jean Mohr
Introduction by Gavin Francis
Published in Great Britain in 2015 by Canongate Books Ltd,
14 High Street, Edinburgh EH1 1TE
First published in Great Britain in 1967 by Allen Lane,
The Penguin Press, Vigo Street, London W1
www.canongate.tv
This digital edition first published in 2014 by Canongate Books
Copyright © 1967 by John Berger
Copyright renewed 1995 by John Berger
Photographs copyright © 1967 by Jean Mohr
Photographs copyright renewed 1995 by Jean Mohr
Afterword copyright © John Berger, 1999
Introduction copyright © Gavin Francis, 2015
The moral right of the author has been asserted
British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data
A catalogue record for this book is available on request from the British Library
ISBN 978 1 78211 501 4
eISBN 978 17 8211 502 1
Typeset in Goudy 11/15 pt by Palimpsest Book Production Ltd,
Falkirk, Stirlingshire
This book is dedicated to
John and Betty whom it concerns, and
to Philip O’Connor
for the letters he wrote to me whilst I was writing it.
J.B.
Contents
Introduction
A Fortunate Man
Afterword
Introduction
A Fortunate Man is a masterpiece of witness: a moving meditation on humanity, society, and the value of healing. First published in 1967 it remains strikingly original, blending John Berger’s text with Jean Mohr’s photographs in a series of superb reflections on the doctor’s role, the roots of cultural and intellectual deprivation, and the motivations that drive medical practice. The subject of the book, John ‘Sassall’, emerges as an individual deeply committed to inner reflection as well as to his vocation as a physician. When I was working as a newly qualified doctor it became my habit to give copies as gifts. For years it’s been out of print and increasingly scarce; the habit was becoming expensive.
When asked how to approach his own work, Berger has often replied, ‘I’m a story-teller.’ ‘Even when I was writing on art,’ he said in 1984, ‘it was really a way of story-telling – story-tellers lose their identity and are open to the lives of other people.’* When I went to meet Berger, to ask him how he and Mohr came to create A Fortunate Man, he began by telling me a story.
It started in London, in the early 1950s, when Berger was a commentator on art for the New Statesman. His essays and reviews were unconventional as well as controversial; he had to fight to keep his job. ‘We received a marvellous essay from an Indian writer called Victor Anant,’ he told me, ‘called “An English Christmas”. On the back of the envelope was the return address: “Left Luggage Office, Paddington Station”. I jumped on my motorbike and drove over to meet him. He’d not long arrived from Bombay, and this was the first job he’d found.’
Anant, like Berger, distrusted established power; in India he had been imprisoned by the Raj. The two men became friends and, several years later when Berger was living in rural Gloucestershire, Anant and his Pakistani wife were drawn to live nearby. Sassall was the single-handed general practitioner who attended the two men at that time.
‘I became friends with Sassall after going to him with some minor medical problem,’ Berger explained. ‘He cured me, and we became friends. I used to meet regularly with him and with Anant to play bridge.’ The two writers recognised in Sassall an outstanding physician as well as the enthusiast of an unfashionable ideal – the Renaissance dream of aspiring to universal knowledge and experience. As a doctor who sought daily to empathise with others, though they be of very different backgrounds and perspectives, they perceived that Sassall came closer to attaining this ideal than most men or women ever could.
By the mid 1960s Berger had moved to Geneva, but both he and Anant were still in touch with Sassall. One day, Anant suggested that Berger write a book about their friend, his medical practice, and his determined pursuit of the universal. Berger again: ‘“You know, this man is really remarkable,” Anant told me, “but one day no one will know of him. His goodness will have consequences, of course, but unless you write about him, the specifics of his life and his attitude may not be preserved.”’
Jean Mohr was at that time also living in Geneva; a photojournalist with the Red Cross and the United Nations who had done some of his finest work documenting the stateless experience of Palestinian refugees. ‘Jean is one of the truly great photographers,’ Berger told me, ‘utterly invisible, blending into the background like a lamp-stand – the perfect man to sit in on medical consultations.’ Sassall invited Berger and Mohr to live with him and his family for six weeks and, with his patients’ permission, join him night and day in the clinic and on emergency visits.
Afterwards the two men returned to Geneva and worked in isolation from one another for just a month – Berger recalls the text flowing fairly quickly. ‘When we got together again, and compared what I’d written with the photographs Jean had chosen, we found we’d replicated one another’s work entirely,’ he said. ‘They were tautologous – as if my text was a series of captions to his images. We had both tried to write the book on our own. That’s not what we wanted at all, so we reworked it so that the words and pictures were like a conversation; building on, rather than mirroring, one another.’ Sassall checked the manuscript and made some minor corrections – ‘medical terminology, technical comments, that sort of thing’ – but was otherwise happy with it. In April 1967 the book was published.
The Guardian carried an early review by Tom Maschler, the celebrated editor at Jonathan Cape, placed between a photograph of a Vietnamese baby scarred with napalm and an advertisement for woollen mini-dresses. ‘It is a beautiful book’, Maschler wrote, ‘John Berger writes with a passion, with an intensity that few writers could achieve.’ He is particularly entranced by the way Sassall, as portrayed by Berger, has an insatiable appetite for human experience, and imaginatively enters the minds of his patients. He closes with the lament that many reviewers feel when confronted by such a visionary and transformative work, but few have the courage to articulate: ‘I only wish I could do justice in a few words to the richness that makes this book so compelling.’
Philip Toynbee, writing in the Observer a few days later, called it ‘a series of brilliant descriptive sketches … a genuine tour de force, and the admirable photographs of the local countryside and its inhabitants match and illuminate the text with an unusual degree of sympathetic understanding’. Toynbee felt particularly well-qualified to comment on the accuracy of Berger’s portrayal of the physician: the book’s subject happened to be his own doctor. ‘The Sassall who emerges from these pages –
both from the text and from the photographs – is indeed the man that I myself have known, liked, and admired for several years. But he is more than the man I know, not because Berger has romanticised him or enlarged him, but because Berger knows him better than I do and has thought about him harder.’
A Fortunate Man is a memorial not just to this exceptional individual but to a way of practising medicine that has almost disappeared. Sassall’s approach to his practice is all-consuming – in today’s culture of working-time-directives and the commercialisation of disease it would be almost impossible to sustain. Sassall has made a Faustian pact: he is rewarded with endless opportunities for experiencing the possibilities inherent in human lives, but at the cost of being subject to immense, and at times unbearable pressures. These pressures manifest themselves as episodes of profound depression, periods during which he is overwhelmed by ‘the suffering of his own patients and his own sense of inadequacy’.
The book opens with a series of ‘case studies’, though the term is too clinical and doesn’t reflect either the emotional subtlety of Berger’s word-sketches or the versatility of Sassall’s responsiveness to his patients. They are glimpses of the situations Sassall responds to every day, recognisable to any doctor, but they convey the extraordinary depth of Sassall’s commitment to his patients. They tell of the struggles of those patients, and also show how powerful an influence the landscape exerts on the community and its stories. As Berger writes in the opening pages: ‘Sometimes a landscape seems to be less a setting for the life of its inhabitants than a curtain behind which their struggles, achievements and accidents take place.’ Within that landscape the community looks to Sassall as a ‘clerk of records’; the figure to whom they tell their stories: ‘He keeps the records so that, from time to time, they can consult them themselves.’
Berger and Mohr follow Sassall through these parallel landscapes – the physical landscape of rural England and the metaphorical one of his patients’ lives. The moral possibilities of medical practice are drawn out, without shying away from the risks that doctors like Sassall run in identifying so closely with those suffering mental and physical pain. The myth of Faust, the life of Paracelsus, the works of Conrad, and the dream of the universal are each examined for the ways they illuminate aspects of Sassall’s motivation. He is compared to one of Conrad’s Master Mariners who sets out to compass not the globe, but the totality of human experience.
Towards the end Berger tries to make an assessment of Sassall’s contribution to society and his community, but finds that he cannot. A society that doesn’t know how to value the lives of its people can’t adequately account for the value of easing their pain. ‘What is the social value of a pain eased?’ Berger asks, ‘What is the value of a life saved? How does the cure of a serious illness compare in value with one of the better poems of a minor poet? How does making a correct but extremely difficult diagnosis compare with painting a great canvas?’ The absurdity of the questions reveals just how far we have to go in appreciating the value not just of art, but of life.
In the years after publication Berger moved to Haute Savoie, a remote Alpine district in the south-east of France close to the Swiss and Italian borders, in order to live closely with people who worked the land. ‘I didn’t go to university,’ he told me, ‘the peasants were my university professors.’ Like Sassall in rural Gloucestershire, Berger became a ‘clerk of records’ for the people he came to live amongst. He poured his reflections on their lives into his trilogy Into Their Labours, as well as works such as The Seventh Man: his exposition, again with Mohr, of Europe’s exploitation of peasant migrant labour. As a story-teller, Berger wishes to lose his identity in that of his subject and his readers, just as Sassall sought to lose his identity in those of his patients. His assessment of Sassall could stand for an assessment of his own life and work: ‘Like an artist or like anybody else who believes that his work justifies his life, Sassall – by our society’s miserable standards – is a fortunate man.’
A few years after A Fortunate Man was written Sassall’s wife died unexpectedly. At the end of his Observer review, Philip Toynbee confessed to a ‘quarrel’ with Berger for leaving her out of the narrative, though the book is dedicated in part to her: ‘this racked and pain-haunted man would have collapsed long ago, and perhaps irretrievably, if it hadn’t been for his wife,’ Toynbee wrote, ‘Her role is as archetypal as his.’ Following her death Sassall left the Gloucestershire practice and travelled for some time in China, learning the ways of the barefoot doctors who were then the main providers of medical care in rural China. His death in 1982, alluded to in Berger’s own postscript, deepens the enigma of his life. A careful reading of A Fortunate Man reveals its title to be a paradox; fitting for a study of a man whose very openness to experience – his gift to the world – may also have been his undoing.
A Fortunate Man is almost fifty years old, but remains fresh, urgent and relevant; a reminder for physicians and patients alike of the essence of medical practice – of the differences between healing and medicating. It is a text with resonance for anyone who admires Sassall’s pursuit of the universal. Like all great works it is many things: a celebration of a way of medicine that we have all but lost, a ground-breaking exercise in photo-documentary, a literary-photographic creation of lasting beauty and a personal study of a man who aspired to an impossible ideal. Sassall’s goal was an intimate appreciation of what it means to be human; medicine was just the vehicle he chose to reach it. In my own work as a general practitioner his kindness and imaginative empathy are an inspiration, but at the same time he stands as a warning of what can happen when boundaries between a physician and his or her patients breaks down.
In trying to assess Sassall’s qualities as a physician Berger wrote ‘he is acknowledged as a good doctor because he meets the deep but unformulated expectation of the sick for a sense of fraternity’. This quest for recognition, and for a sense of fraternity, has rarely been articulated so beautifully. Back in 1967, Tom Maschler concluded his Guardian review of A Fortunate Man saying simply: ‘I am grateful for it.’ I too am grateful: to Victor Anant for suggesting the book in the first place, to John Berger and Jean Mohr for crafting such a masterpiece, and of course to Sassall, and his family, for permitting the intimate details of his life and attitudes to be set down. Through this new edition I hope many more readers come to know that gratitude.
Gavin Francis
* Interview in Marxism Today, December 1984, with Geoff Dyer.
A Fortunate Man
Landscapes can be deceptive. Sometimes a landscape seems to be less a setting for the life of its inhabitants than a curtain behind which their struggles, achievements and accidents take place.
For those who, with the inhabitants, are behind the curtain, landmarks are no longer only geographic but also biographical and personal.
One of them shouted a warning, but it was too late. The leaves brushed him down almost delicately. The small branches encaged him. And then the tree and the whole hill crushed him together.
A man breathlessly said that a woodman was trapped beneath a tree. The doctor asked the dispenser to find out exactly where: then suddenly picked up his own phone, interrupted her and spoke himself. He must know exactly where. Which was the nearest gate in the nearest field? Whose field? He would need a stretcher. His own stretcher had been left in hospital the day before. He told the dispenser to phone immediately for an ambulance and tell it to wait by the bridge which was the nearest point on the road. At home in the garage there was an old door off its hinges. Blood plasma from the dispensary, door from the garage. As he drove through the lanes he kept his thumb on the horn the whole time, partly to warn oncoming traffic, partly so that the man under the tree might hear it and know that the doctor was coming.
After five minutes he turned off the road and drove uphill, into the mist. As often up there above the river, it was a very white mist, a mist that seemed to deny all weight and solidity. He had to stop twice to ope
n gates. The third gate was already slightly open, so he drove through it without stopping. It swung back and crashed against the rear of the Land Rover. Some sheep, startled, appeared and disappeared into the mist. All the while he had his thumb on the horn for the woodman to hear. After one more field he saw a figure waving behind the mist – as if he were trying to wipe clean a vast steamed-up window.
When the doctor reached him the man said: ‘He’s been screaming ever since. He’s suffering something terrible doctor.’ The man would tell the story many times, and the first would be tonight in the village. But it was not yet a story. The advent of the doctor brought the conclusion much nearer, but the accident was not yet over: the wounded man was still screaming at the other two men who were hammering in wedges preparatory to lifting the tree.
‘Christ let me alone.’ As he cried ‘alone’ the doctor was beside him. The wounded man recognized the doctor; his eyes focused. For him too the conclusion was nearer and this gave him the courage to be quieter. Suddenly it was silent. The men had stopped hammering but were still kneeling on the ground. They knelt and looked at the doctor. His hands are at home on a body. Even these new wounds which had not existed twenty minutes before were familiar to him. Within seconds of being beside the man he injected morphine. The three onlookers were relieved by the doctor’s presence. But now his very sureness made it seem to them that he was part of the accident: almost its accomplice.
‘He had a chance,’ said one of the kneeling men, ‘when Harry here shouted but he went and turned about the wrong way.’
The doctor set up the plasma for a transfusion into the arm. As he moved around, he explained what he was doing to try to reassure the others.
‘I shouted at him,’ said Harry, ‘he could have got clear if he’d looked sharp.’
‘He would have got clear like that,’ said the third.
